Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan

[2025] SGHC 125 High Court (General Division) 2 July 2025 HC/S 510/2021

6 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	2 July 2025
Judge	S Mohan
Charges / claim	Civil Procedure
Counsel	Dodwell & Co LLC, Alfred Dodwell

Source: [2025] SGHC 125, High Court (General Division), decided 2 July 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Costs — Whether plaintiff only entitled to costs based on the Magistrate’s Court scale Civil Procedure — Costs — Whether costs unreasonably incurred by plaintiff commencing and prosecuting action in the General Division of the High Court

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

S Mohan Delivered

Counsel (2)

Dodwell & Co LLC Firm Alfred Dodwell Counsel for the plaintiff

Parties (2)

Diana Foo Plaintiff Woo Mui Chan Defendant

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 125 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 2 July 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing costs. The judgment was delivered by S Mohan. The case was brought by Diana Foo (plaintiff) against Woo Mui Chan (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Dodwell & Co LLC. The judgment cites 6 cases and references 1 statutory provision, namely the State Courts Act. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.

Summary

Following a successful defamation action by a lawyer against a former friend where damages were assessed at $42,000, the plaintiff sought costs of $175,268 on the High Court scale. The court awarded costs of only $25,000 on the Magistrate's Court scale, finding the claim was at all times a Magistrate's Court action in terms of quantum, the plaintiff's unrealistic damages claim was a significant factor, and the costs sought were grossly disproportionate to the damages awarded.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 125?

[2025] SGHC 125 (Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2 July 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically costs. The judgment was delivered by S Mohan.

Who were the parties in Diana Foo v Woo Mui Chan ([2025] SGHC 125)?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGHC 125 was Diana Foo, and the defendant was Woo Mui Chan. Legal representation included Dodwell & Co LLC. The case was decided on 2 July 2025 in the High Court (General Division).