Vikramathithan A/L Rasu v AK Equine Pte Ltd
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Mohamed Faizal |
| Charges / claim | Companies, Limitation of Actions |
| Counsel | LVM Law Chambers LLC, Yeo Perumal Mohideen Law Corporation, Jonathan Ong Hee Jun, Muhamad Ashraf s/o Syed Ansarai, Pak Waltan |
Source: [2025] SGHC 65, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (5)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHC 65 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 11 April 2025 concerning Companies and Limitation of Actions, specifically addressing striking off defunct companies and limitation direction. The judgment was delivered by Mohamed Faizal. The case was brought by Vikramathithan a/l Rasu (applicant) against AK Equine Pte Ltd (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Yeo Perumal Mohideen Law Corporation and LVM Law Chambers LLC. The judgment cites 7 cases (6 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 4 statutory provisions, including the Companies Act, the Limitation Act, and the Report of the Law Reform Committee on the Review of the Limitation Act.
[2025] SGHC 65 explained
Vikramathithan A/L Rasu v AK Equine Pte Ltd ([2025] SGHC 65) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 11 April 2025. It is categorised under Companies and Limitation of Actions. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHC 65 about?
Vikramathithan A/L Rasu v AK Equine Pte Ltd ([2025] SGHC 65) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Companies — Striking off defunct companies — Restoration of struck off company” and “Limitation of Actions — Limitation direction — Section 344G(3) Companies Act 1967”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHC 65 consider?
The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50), Limitation Act (Cap 163), Report of the Law Reform Committee on the Review of the Limitation Act (Cap 163), and UK Companies Act (Cap 50). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHC 65 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 270. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
A worker injured in a workplace accident at a horse training facility sought to restore the struck-off company AK Equine Pte Ltd to the register in order to pursue a negligence claim. The court granted the restoration application and, in what appears to be the first domestic limitation direction under s 344G(3) of the Companies Act 1967, excluded the period after the letter of demand until restoration from the limitation calculation.
What was decided in [2025] SGHC 65?
[2025] SGHC 65 (Vikramathithan A/L Rasu v AK Equine Pte Ltd) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 11 April 2025 addressing Companies and Limitation of Actions, specifically striking off defunct companies and limitation direction. The judgment was delivered by Mohamed Faizal.
Who were the parties in Vikramathithan A/L Rasu v AK Equine Pte Ltd ([2025] SGHC 65)?
The applicant in [2025] SGHC 65 was Vikramathithan a/l Rasu, and the respondent was AK Equine Pte Ltd. Legal representation included Yeo Perumal Mohideen Law Corporation and LVM Law Chambers LLC. The case was decided on 11 April 2025 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 65?
[2025] SGHC 65 was delivered by Mohamed Faizal in the High Court (General Division) on 11 April 2025. The case concerned Companies and Limitation of Actions.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 65 cite?
[2025] SGHC 65 cites 7 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Companies Act, Limitation Act, Report of the Law Reform Committee on the Review of the Limitation Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (7)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHC 65)