PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v TEO HWEE PENG

[2025] SGHC 69 High Court (General Division) 14 April 2025 HC/MA 9094/2023/01 · HC/MA 9159/2023/01 · HC/MA 9159/2023/02

14 cases cited (13 SG, 1 foreign)

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	14 April 2025
Judge	Vincent Hoong
Charges / claim	Criminal Law
Counsel	Attorney-General's Chambers, Vijay & Co., Andrew Chia, David Menon, Jheong Siew Yin, Narayanan Vijya Kumar

Source: [2025] SGHC 69, High Court (General Division), decided 14 April 2025 — eLitigation. Updated 3 July 2026.

Catchwords

Criminal Law — Appeal Criminal Law — Statutory offences — Prevention of Corruption Act

Practice Areas

Criminal Law

Judges (1)

Vincent Hoong Delivered

Counsel (6)

Attorney-General's Chambers Firm Vijay & Co. Firm

Andrew Chia Counsel for the appellant

David Menon Counsel for the appellant Jheong Siew Yin Counsel for the appellant Narayanan Vijya Kumar Counsel for the respondent

Parties (2)

Public Prosecutor Appellant

Teo Hwee Peng Respondent

Case Significance

[2025] SGHC 69 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 14 April 2025 concerning Criminal Law, specifically addressing appeal and statutory offences. The judgment was delivered by Vincent Hoong. The case was brought by Public Prosecutor (appellant) against Teo Hwee Peng (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Attorney-General's Chambers and Vijay & Co.. The judgment cites 14 cases (13 Singapore, 1 foreign) and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Criminal Procedure Code, the Interpretation Act, and the Prevention of Corruption Act.

Summary

The accused pleaded guilty to culpable homicide not amounting to murder for repeatedly punching her elderly mother in the face, causing fatal brain injuries, after years of caretaker stress and untreated mental health issues. The court sentenced her to eight years' imprisonment, taking into account her major depressive disorder which substantially contributed to the offence but noting the need for deterrence given the vulnerability of elderly victims.

What was decided in [2025] SGHC 69?

[2025] SGHC 69 (PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v TEO HWEE PENG) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 14 April 2025 addressing Criminal Law, specifically appeal and statutory offences. The judgment was delivered by Vincent Hoong.

Who were the parties in PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v TEO HWEE PENG ([2025] SGHC 69)?

The appellant in [2025] SGHC 69 was Public Prosecutor, and the respondent was Teo Hwee Peng. Legal representation included Vijay & Co. and Attorney-General's Chambers. The case was decided on 14 April 2025 in the High Court (General Division).

Which judge decided [2025] SGHC 69?

[2025] SGHC 69 was delivered by Vincent Hoong in the High Court (General Division) on 14 April 2025. The case concerned Criminal Law.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHC 69 cite?

[2025] SGHC 69 cites 14 prior decisions, including 1 from foreign jurisdictions. It references Criminal Procedure Code, Interpretation Act, Prevention of Corruption Act.

Statutes Cited

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68) Cases on this Act →

s 295

Interpretation Act (Cap 1) Cases on this Act →

s 40 s 41

Prevention of Corruption Act (Cap 241) Cases on this Act →

s 6(a)

Cases Cited (14)

SG (1)

[2024] SGHC 319

SLR (12)

[1993] 3 SLR(R) 566 [1995] 3 SLR(R) 404 [1997] 1 SLR(R) 721 [1998] 3 SLR(R) 619 [2006] 4 SLR(R) 45 [2012] 2 SLR 113 [2014] 4 SLR 623 [2020] 1 SLR 486 [2021] 1 SLR 744 [2022] 2 SLR 676 [2023] 4 SLR 1385 [2025] 3 SLR 578

MY (1)

[1986] 1 MLJ 162