XCQ v XCP
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHCF 26 is a High Court (Family Division) decision dated 21 April 2025 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing custody. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by XCQ (appellant) against XCP (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Drew & Napier LLC and CHP Law LLC. The judgment cites 4 cases. This decision has been cited by 1 subsequent judgment in the dataset.
Summary
A father appealed against orders granting the mother sole care and control of their 5-year-old child, with conditions requiring him to take breath analyser tests before access due to alleged alcohol issues. The court allowed the appeal in part, increasing the father's access to include Thursday overnight access and revoking the alcohol-testing conditions for lack of sufficient evidence.
What was decided in [2025] SGHCF 26?
[2025] SGHCF 26 (XCQ v XCP) is a High Court (Family Division) decision from 21 April 2025 addressing Family Law, specifically custody. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.
Who were the parties in XCQ v XCP?
The appellant in [2025] SGHCF 26 was XCQ, and the respondent was XCP. Legal representation included Drew & Napier LLC and CHP Law LLC. The case was decided on 21 April 2025 in the High Court (Family Division).
Which judge decided [2025] SGHCF 26?
[2025] SGHCF 26 was delivered by Choo Han Teck in the High Court (Family Division) on 21 April 2025. The case concerned Family Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHCF 26 cite?
[2025] SGHCF 26 cites 4 prior decisions. The decision has itself been cited by 1 subsequent judgment.
Cases Cited (4)
Cited By (1)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCF 26)