DYNAMIC OIL TRADING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (IN CREDITORS’ VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) v DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Key facts
| Court | High Court Registrar |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Vikram Rajaram |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, Legal Solutions LLC, WongPartnership LLP, Charmaine Ong, Gabriel Koh, Goh Wei Wei, Kevin Kwek, Kong Pek Yoke, Phyllis Chin, Randolph Khoo, Sharon Ki, Tan Ee Hsien, Tan Shi Hui |
Source: [2025] SGHCR 24, High Court Registrar, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (13)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHCR 24 is a High Court Registrar decision dated 25 July 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing third party proceedings. The judgment was delivered by Vikram Rajaram. The case was brought by Dynamic Oil Trading (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation) (plaintiff) against Deloitte & Touche LLP (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Drew & Napier LLC and WongPartnership LLP. The judgment cites 6 cases (4 Singapore, 2 foreign).
[2025] SGHCR 24 explained
DYNAMIC OIL TRADING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (IN CREDITORS’ VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) v DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP ([2025] SGHCR 24) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court Registrar on 25 July 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHCR 24 about?
DYNAMIC OIL TRADING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (IN CREDITORS’ VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) v DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP ([2025] SGHCR 24) is a High Court Registrar decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure – Third party proceedings – Whether orders made on a summons for third party directions should be varied”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
The defendant auditor, Deloitte & Touche, applied to vary earlier third party directions to combine the trial of the main action and third party proceedings, rather than having them tried separately. The court allowed the variation, finding a combined trial would promote greater efficiency and reduce the risk of inconsistent findings, given the significant overlap of issues between the audit negligence claim and the contribution claims against the company's former directors.
What was decided in [2025] SGHCR 24?
[2025] SGHCR 24 (DYNAMIC OIL TRADING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (IN CREDITORS’ VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) v DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP) is a High Court Registrar decision from 25 July 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically third party proceedings. The judgment was delivered by Vikram Rajaram.
Who were the parties in DYNAMIC OIL TRADING (SINGAPORE) PTE LTD (IN CREDITORS’ VOLUNTARY LIQUIDATION AND RECEIVERSHIP) v DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP ([2025] SGHCR 24)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHCR 24 was Dynamic Oil Trading (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in Creditors' Voluntary Liquidation), and the defendant was Deloitte & Touche LLP. Legal representation included Drew & Napier LLC and Legal Solutions LLC. The case was decided on 25 July 2025 in the High Court Registrar.
Which judge decided [2025] SGHCR 24?
[2025] SGHCR 24 was delivered by Vikram Rajaram in the High Court Registrar on 25 July 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHCR 24 cite?
[2025] SGHCR 24 cites 6 prior decisions, including 2 from foreign jurisdictions.
Cases Cited (6)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCR 24)