GHP FAR EAST LIMITED v NPG GLOBAL PTE LTD & Anor
Key facts
| Court | High Court Registrar |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Perry Peh |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure |
| Counsel | Aequitas Law LLP, Shermaine Ang |
Source: [2025] SGHCR 37, High Court Registrar, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (2)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHCR 37 is a High Court Registrar decision dated 21 November 2025 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing conferences (pre-trial). The judgment was delivered by Perry Peh. The case was brought by GHP Far East Ltd (plaintiff) against NPG Global Pte Ltd and others (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Aequitas Law LLP. The judgment cites 13 cases.
[2025] SGHCR 37 explained
GHP FAR EAST LIMITED v NPG GLOBAL PTE LTD & Anor ([2025] SGHCR 37) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court Registrar on 21 November 2025. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHCR 37 about?
GHP FAR EAST LIMITED v NPG GLOBAL PTE LTD & Anor ([2025] SGHCR 37) is a High Court Registrar decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Conferences (pre-trial) — Order 9 r 4 of the Rules of Court 2021”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2025] SGHCR 37 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGCA 32, [2025] SGHCR 9, and [2024] SGHC 65. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
GHP Far East sought to enforce a Hong Kong judgment against NPG Global and its director for approximately HK$3.9 million in an agency fee dispute. The defendants resisted on grounds of breach of natural justice and public policy. The court granted summary judgment enforcing the Hong Kong judgment, finding the defendants had adequate notice and opportunity to participate in the Hong Kong proceedings and that enforcement would not be contrary to Singapore public policy.
What was decided in [2025] SGHCR 37?
[2025] SGHCR 37 (GHP FAR EAST LIMITED v NPG GLOBAL PTE LTD & Anor) is a High Court Registrar decision from 21 November 2025 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically conferences (pre-trial). The judgment was delivered by Perry Peh.
Who were the parties in GHP FAR EAST LIMITED v NPG GLOBAL PTE LTD & Anor ([2025] SGHCR 37)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHCR 37 was GHP Far East Ltd, and the defendant was NPG Global Pte Ltd, Chia Po Li. Legal representation included Aequitas Law LLP. The case was decided on 21 November 2025 in the High Court Registrar.
Which judge decided [2025] SGHCR 37?
[2025] SGHCR 37 was delivered by Perry Peh in the High Court Registrar on 21 November 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHCR 37 cite?
[2025] SGHCR 37 cites 13 prior decisions.
Cases Cited (13)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCR 37)