SREE RAM CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD v GREEN TAG SCAFFOLDING PTE LTD & Anor

[2025] SGHCR 39 High Court Registrar 26 December 2025 • HC/OC 429/2025 ( HC/SUM 2221/2025 ) • 27 min read
5 cases cited

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (4)

Parties (3)

Case Significance

[2025] SGHCR 39 is a High Court Registrar decision dated 26 December 2025 concerning Civil Procedure and Restitution, specifically addressing pleadings and unjust enrichment. The judgment was delivered by Vikram Rajaram. The case was brought by Sree Ram Construction Pte Ltd (plaintiff) against Green Tag Scaffolding Pte Ltd and others (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Forte Law LLC and Jacob Mansur & Pillai. The judgment cites 5 cases.

Summary

A defendant in a construction dispute sought to strike out the claimant's separate action on the basis that O 6 r 8(1) of the Rules of Court 2021 mandates that all claims against a claimant must be brought as counterclaims rather than fresh proceedings. The court dismissed the application, holding that despite the change in wording from the 2014 Rules, the provision enables but does not compel a defendant to counterclaim, and the unjust enrichment claim was not plainly unsustainable.

What was decided in [2025] SGHCR 39?

[2025] SGHCR 39 (SREE RAM CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD v GREEN TAG SCAFFOLDING PTE LTD & Anor) is a High Court Registrar decision from 26 December 2025 addressing Civil Procedure and Restitution, specifically pleadings and unjust enrichment. The judgment was delivered by Vikram Rajaram.

Who were the parties in SREE RAM CONSTRUCTION PTE LTD v GREEN TAG SCAFFOLDING PTE LTD & Anor?

The plaintiff in [2025] SGHCR 39 was Sree Ram Construction Pte Ltd, and the defendant was Green Tag Scaffolding Pte Ltd, Mani Senthil Kumar. Legal representation included Jacob Mansur & Pillai and Forte Law LLC. The case was decided on 26 December 2025 in the High Court Registrar.

Which judge decided [2025] SGHCR 39?

[2025] SGHCR 39 was delivered by Vikram Rajaram in the High Court Registrar on 26 December 2025. The case concerned Civil Procedure and Restitution.

What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHCR 39 cite?

[2025] SGHCR 39 cites 5 prior decisions.

Cases Cited (5)

SLR (5)
[2002] 2 SLR(R) 706 [2012] 4 SLR 546 [2013] 3 SLR 527 [2022] 2 SLR 1018 [2025] 3 SLR 235

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCR 39)