MAYBANK SINGAPORE LIMITED v ELAVARASAN S/O MANOHARAN
Key facts
| Court | High Court Registrar |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Randeep Singh Koonar |
| Charges / claim | Insolvency Law |
| Counsel | Advent Law Corporation, Insolvency & Public Trustee's Office, Goh Yin Dee, Ng Huan Yong |
Source: [2025] SGHCR 4, High Court Registrar, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (4)
Case Significance
[2025] SGHCR 4 is a High Court Registrar decision dated 7 April 2025 concerning Insolvency Law, specifically addressing bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Randeep Singh Koonar. The case was brought by Maybank Singapore Limited (plaintiff) against Elavarasan s/o Manoharan (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Advent Law Corporation. The judgment references 2 statutory provisions, including the Insolvency and the Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
[2025] SGHCR 4 explained
MAYBANK SINGAPORE LIMITED v ELAVARASAN S/O MANOHARAN ([2025] SGHCR 4) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court Registrar on 7 April 2025. It is categorised under Insolvency Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2025] SGHCR 4 about?
MAYBANK SINGAPORE LIMITED v ELAVARASAN S/O MANOHARAN ([2025] SGHCR 4) is a High Court Registrar decision from 2025. Its published catchwords are “Insolvency Law — Bankruptcy — Bankruptcy order”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2025] SGHCR 4 consider?
The judgment refers to Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
Maybank applied for a bankruptcy order against a debtor who owed $120,876.40 as a loan guarantor, despite the Official Assignee's request for further adjournment to complete a debt repayment scheme assessment. The court made the bankruptcy order, finding the debtor had caused inexcusable delays over nearly two years through dilatory conduct including late submissions to the Official Assignee, which constituted a clear abuse of process and prejudice to the creditor.
What was decided in [2025] SGHCR 4?
[2025] SGHCR 4 (MAYBANK SINGAPORE LIMITED v ELAVARASAN S/O MANOHARAN) is a High Court Registrar decision from 7 April 2025 addressing Insolvency Law, specifically bankruptcy. The judgment was delivered by Randeep Singh Koonar.
Who were the parties in MAYBANK SINGAPORE LIMITED v ELAVARASAN S/O MANOHARAN ([2025] SGHCR 4)?
The plaintiff in [2025] SGHCR 4 was Maybank Singapore Limited, and the defendant was Elavarasan s/o Manoharan. Legal representation included Advent Law Corporation and Insolvency & Public Trustee's Office. The case was decided on 7 April 2025 in the High Court Registrar.
Which judge decided [2025] SGHCR 4?
[2025] SGHCR 4 was delivered by Randeep Singh Koonar in the High Court Registrar on 7 April 2025. The case concerned Insolvency Law.
What cases and statutes does [2025] SGHCR 4 cite?
references Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
Statutes Cited
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2025] SGHCR 4)