JFE v JFF

[2026] SGDC 97 District Court 16 March 2026 DC/OC 1614/2024 ( DC/SUM 1151/2025,DC/RA 27/2025 ) 17 min read

7 cases cited (6 SG, 1 foreign) Cited by 1 case

Key facts

Court	District Court
Decided	16 March 2026
Judge	Chiah Kok Khun
Charges / claim	Civil Procedure
Counsel	Kalco Law LLC, Joshua Tong Siu Hong

Source: [2026] SGDC 97, District Court, decided 16 March 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 10 July 2026.

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Appeals — Adducing fresh evidence on appeal — Appellant seeking to adduce fresh evidence on appeal to contend that the appellant’s entire debt to the claimant had been repaid — Legal principles governing adduction of further evidence in an appeal — Whether Ladd v Marshall principles applicable

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Chiah Kok Khun Delivered

Counsel (2)

Kalco Law LLC Firm Joshua Tong Siu Hong Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

JFE Plaintiff JFF Defendant

[2026] SGDC 97 explained

JFE v JFF ([2026] SGDC 97) is a Singapore judgment decided by the District Court on 16 March 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGDC 97 about?

JFE v JFF ([2026] SGDC 97) is a District Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Appeals — Adducing fresh evidence on appeal — Appellant seeking to adduce fresh evidence on appeal to contend that the appellant’s entire debt to the claimant had been repaid — Legal principles governing adduction of further evidence in an appeal — Whether Ladd v Marshall principles applicable”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

How influential is [2026] SGDC 97?

Within this corpus, [2026] SGDC 97 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.