JFR v JFT
Outcome
Claim dismissed“The claim is dismissed.”
Source: [2026] SGECT 15, Employment Claims Tribunals, decided 29 September 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Key facts
| Court | Employment Claims Tribunals |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Kevin Ho Hin Tat |
| Charges / claim | Employment Law |
| Outcome | Claim dismissed |
Source: [2026] SGECT 15, Employment Claims Tribunals, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
JFR v JFT [2026] SGECT 15 was decided by Tribunal Magistrate Kevin Ho Hin Tat in the Employment Claims Tribunals on 29 September 2026. The claimant, employed as a Senior Social Media Executive at a monthly salary of $4,000, took on creative functions from March 2024, was placed on a Performance Improvement Plan on or about 19 November 2025, did not pass it, and tendered her resignation on 30 March 2026. She claimed wrongful dismissal, amended to $4,000. The issues were whether she was dismissed, whether the dismissal was wrongful, and what compensation was due. The Tribunal found she was forced to resign and so was dismissed under s 2(1) of the Employment Act 1968, but not without just cause or excuse. The claim was dismissed.
[2026] SGECT 15 explained
JFR v JFT ([2026] SGECT 15) is a Singapore judgment decided by the SGECT on 29 September 2026. It is categorised under Employment Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGECT 15 about?
JFR v JFT ([2026] SGECT 15) is a SGECT decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Employment Law – Dismissal without just cause or excuse – Forced resignation under s 2(1) of the Employment Act 1968”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGECT 15 consider?
The judgment refers to Employment Act (Cap 91). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
The Employment Claims Tribunals heard a claim by JFR, a Senior Social Media Executive, against her employer JFT, alleging wrongful dismissal after she failed a Performance Improvement Plan and resigned on 30 March 2026. The Tribunal Magistrate found she did not resign voluntarily and was therefore dismissed within the meaning of the Employment Act 1968, but held the dismissal was not without just cause or excuse. The claim was dismissed, with each party bearing its own costs and disbursements.
What was JFR v JFT [2026] SGECT 15 about?
A Senior Social Media Executive claimed wrongful dismissal against her employer after failing a Performance Improvement Plan and resigning on 30 March 2026. The Tribunal found a forced resignation amounting to dismissal, but dismissal with just cause or excuse.
What was the outcome of the wrongful dismissal claim in [2026] SGECT 15?
The Tribunal Magistrate found the claimant was not dismissed without just cause or excuse, because the respondent produced contemporaneous evidence of genuine performance concerns. The claim was dismissed and each party bore its own costs and disbursements.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (2)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGECT 15)