XYY v XYZ

[2026] SGFC 17 Family Court 30 January 2026 FC/OAD 356/2025 ( FC/SUM 2891/2025,FC/SUM 2894/2025 ) 9 min read

3 cases cited

Key facts

Court	Family Court
Decided	30 January 2026
Judge	Soh Kian Peng
Charges / claim	Family Law
Counsel	BC Lim & Lau LLC, Malcus Poh Law Corporation, Fang Yashi, Li Xianliang, Jevan

Source: [2026] SGFC 17, Family Court, decided 30 January 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 10 July 2026.

Catchwords

Family Law — Procedure — Application for Disclosure

Practice Areas

Family Law

Judges (1)

Soh Kian Peng Delivered

Counsel (4)

BC Lim & Lau LLC Firm Malcus Poh Law Corporation Firm Fang Yashi Counsel Applicant Li Xianliang, Jevan Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

XYY Applicant XYZ Respondent

Case Significance

[2026] SGFC 17 is a Family Court decision dated 30 January 2026 concerning Family Law, specifically addressing procedure. The judgment was delivered by Soh Kian Peng. The case was brought by XYY (applicant) against XYZ (respondent). Legal representation was provided by Malcus Poh Law Corporation and BC Lim & Lau LLC. The judgment cites 3 cases.

[2026] SGFC 17 explained

XYY v XYZ ([2026] SGFC 17) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 30 January 2026. It is categorised under Family Law. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGFC 17 about?

XYY v XYZ ([2026] SGFC 17) is a Family Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family Law — Procedure — Application for Disclosure”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGFC 17 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHCR 8. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

Summary

In divorce ancillary matters filed under the new Family Justice (General) Rules 2024, both parties applied for disclosure of documents and information from each other. The court addressed the new disclosure framework under the FJ(G)R 2024, which requires the requesting party to show relevance to an issue in the proceedings and demonstrate the application is necessary, and made targeted orders for specific financial documents.

What was decided in [2026] SGFC 17?

[2026] SGFC 17 (XYY v XYZ) is a Family Court decision from 30 January 2026 addressing Family Law, specifically procedure. The judgment was delivered by Soh Kian Peng.

Who were the parties in XYY v XYZ ([2026] SGFC 17)?

The applicant in [2026] SGFC 17 was XYY, and the respondent was XYZ. Legal representation included BC Lim & Lau LLC and Malcus Poh Law Corporation. The case was decided on 30 January 2026 in the Family Court.