YAE v YAF

[2026] SGFC 35 Family Court 16 March 2026 SSP 242/2025 23 min read
1 cases cited Cited by 1 case

Outcome

Application dismissed

the summons is dismissed.

Source: [2026] SGFC 35, Family Court, decided 16 March 2026. Read directly from the judgment.

Key facts

Court Family Court
Decided
Judge Chua Wei Yuan
Charges / claim Family violence Emotional or psychological abuse
Outcome Application dismissed
Counsel Fernandez LLC, Patrick Fernandez

Source: [2026] SGFC 35, Family Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .

Catchwords

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Counsel (2)

Parties (2)

[2026] SGFC 35 explained

YAE v YAF ([2026] SGFC 35) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Family Court on 16 March 2026. It is categorised under Family violence Emotional or psychological abuse. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGFC 35 about?

YAE v YAF ([2026] SGFC 35) is a Family Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Family violence Emotional or psychological abuse”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Which legislation does [2026] SGFC 35 consider?

The judgment refers to Children and Young Persons Act (Cap 38), Vulnerable Adults Act, and Women's Charter (Cap 353). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.

How influential is [2026] SGFC 35?

Within this corpus, [2026] SGFC 35 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.

Statutes Cited

Cases Cited (1)

SLR (1)
[2003] 3 SLR(R) 356

Cited By (1)

Related cases

Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.

Referenced in

Statutes interpreted in this judgment

Legal concepts & references

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.

Read on eLitigation

Source: eLitigation ([2026] SGFC 35)