BP PROJECTS PTE LTD v ONE WIND PTE LTD & 4 Ors
Outcome
Claim dismissedI thus dismiss the claim in unlawful means conspiracy.
Source: [2026] SGHC 105, High Court (General Division), decided 14 May 2026. Read directly from the judgment.
Featured in the weekly digest — week of 11–17 May 2026 →
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Wong Li Kok, Alex |
| Charges / claim | Tort |
| Outcome | Claim dismissed |
| Counsel | Kishan Law Chambers LLC, Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC, Derek Tan Chang Shen, Kishan Pratap, Reuben Tan Wei Jer, Teh Ryan Christopher Wei Jun |
Source: [2026] SGHC 105, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Case Significance
BP Projects Pte Ltd v One Wind Pte Ltd and others [2026] SGHC 105, decided by Justice Wong Li Kok, Alex of the High Court General Division on 14 May 2026, concerns a claim by BP Projects Pte Ltd (GST-registered since the 1990s) against five defendants — One Wind Pte Ltd, Jueltech Trading Pte Ltd, Ong Kian Meng, Ong Kian Seng, and Adeline Yeo — for losses suffered through an alleged GST missing trader fraud. The claimant alleged that the defendants orchestrated a scheme exploiting the non-payment of GST and the claiming of GST refunds in transactions involving handphones and peripheral equipment. BP Projects brought claims in both fraudulent misrepresentation and unlawful means conspiracy. Derek Tan Chang Shen, Reuben Tan Wei Jer, and Teh Ryan Christopher Wei Jun of Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC acted for the claimant; Kishan Pratap of Kishan Law Chambers LLC acted for the defendants. The case, tried on 22–23 October 2025 and 16 January 2026, provides an illustration of how civil claims in misrepresentation and conspiracy can follow from GST fraud allegations.
[2026] SGHC 105 explained
BP PROJECTS PTE LTD v ONE WIND PTE LTD & 4 Ors ([2026] SGHC 105) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 14 May 2026. It is categorised under Tort. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 105 about?
BP PROJECTS PTE LTD v ONE WIND PTE LTD & 4 Ors ([2026] SGHC 105) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Tort – Conspiracy” and “Tort – Misrepresentation – Fraud and deceit”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 105 consider?
The judgment refers to Misrepresentation Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHC 105 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 279. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
Summary
BP Projects Pte Ltd sued One Wind Pte Ltd, Jueltech Trading Pte Ltd, and associated individuals for fraudulent misrepresentation and unlawful means conspiracy arising from a missing trader GST fraud scheme involving transactions in handphones and telecommunications equipment. The claimant alleged it was induced to participate in transactions that exposed it to GST liability while the defendants profited from non-payment of GST. The court upheld the claims in fraudulent misrepresentation against the first three defendants and ordered them to compensate the claimant S$1,747,483.65, but dismissed the unlawful means conspiracy claim.
What is a missing trader fraud and how did it arise in BP Projects Pte Ltd v One Wind Pte Ltd ([2026] SGHC 105)?
A missing trader fraud involves manipulating the non-payment of GST to generate unlawful refund claims. In [2026] SGHC 105, BP Projects Pte Ltd alleged that One Wind Pte Ltd, Jueltech Trading Pte Ltd, Ong Kian Meng, Ong Kian Seng, and Adeline Yeo orchestrated such a scheme in handphone transactions, causing BP Projects to suffer losses, giving rise to claims in misrepresentation and unlawful means conspiracy.
Which judge decided the GST fraud civil claim in BP Projects Pte Ltd v One Wind Pte Ltd in 2026 ([2026] SGHC 105)?
Justice Wong Li Kok, Alex of the High Court General Division decided [2026] SGHC 105 on 14 May 2026, after a trial on 22–23 October 2025 and 16 January 2026. The case involved BP Projects Pte Ltd's claims in fraudulent misrepresentation and unlawful means conspiracy against five defendants over an alleged GST missing trader fraud.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (8)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 105)