Derek Tan Chang Shen
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Derek Tan Chang Shen. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Derek Tan Chang Shen appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Tort, and Derek Tan Chang Shen acted for the third party in 2 and the plaintiff in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court
- Period
- October 2023 to May 2026
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Derek Tan Chang Shen — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Derek Tan Chang Shen appeared
- Counsel for the third party
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 1 case
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Claim allowed in part
- 1
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
- Claim dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 3 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I conclude that the claims against D1, D2 and D3 in the tort of fraudulent misrepresentation have been made out and they are to compensate the Claimant in the amount of $1,747,483.65.”
High Court · 14 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 105 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Claim allowed in part -
“I dismissed the appeals as Ms Lim’s contribution claims against the third parties were time-barred.”
High Court · 27 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 303 · Counsel for the third party · Appeal dismissed -
“I therefore dismiss the claim with costs to Joyce.”
High Court · 11 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 288 · Counsel for the defendant · Claim dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Derek Tan Chang Shen practice?
Counsel for the plaintiff (1)
-
The court allowed the claim in part.
High Court · 14 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 105
Counsel for the third party (2)
-
Aidan Xu J allowed the application in part.
High Court · 13 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC 6 -
The High Court dismissed all six appeals because Ms Lim's contribution claims against the third parties were time-barred.
High Court · 27 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 303
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The High Court dismissed the claim with costs to Joyce, finding that the parties intended an equal and unconditional split of the joint account assets and that the Trust Portion belonged to Joyce;…
High Court · 11 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 288