GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee

[2026] SGHC 17 High Court (General Division) 23 January 2026 HC/OC 823/2023 ( HC/SUM 3351/2025 ) 5 min read

2 cases cited

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	23 January 2026
Judge	Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim	Civil Procedure
Counsel	Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, PD Legal, Gerard Quek Wen Jiang, Glenn Chua Ze Xuan, Hamza Zafar Malik, Suang Wijaya

Source: [2026] SGHC 17, High Court (General Division), decided 23 January 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 10 July 2026.

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Judgments and orders — Stay of execution of judgment pending appeal — Stay of execution of costs order

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Choo Han Teck Delivered

Counsel (6)

Eugene Thuraisingam LLP Firm PD Legal Firm Gerard Quek Wen Jiang Counsel Defendant Glenn Chua Ze Xuan Counsel Defendant Hamza Zafar Malik Counsel Plaintiff Suang Wijaya Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (5)

Illume Holding Pte Ltd Plaintiff Unum In Infinitum Inc Plaintiff Daniel Maag Plaintiff Gurpreet Gill Maag Plaintiff Ian McKee Defendant

Case Significance

[2026] SGHC 17 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 23 January 2026 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing judgments and orders. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by Illume Holding Pte Ltd and others (plaintiff) against Ian McKee (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and PD Legal. The judgment cites 2 cases.

[2026] SGHC 17 explained

GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee ([2026] SGHC 17) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 23 January 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGHC 17 about?

GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee ([2026] SGHC 17) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Judgments and orders — Stay of execution of judgment pending appeal — Stay of execution of costs order”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHC 17 cite?

Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2024] SGHC 47. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.

Summary

Four applicants sought a mandatory injunction against their former business partner Ian McKee for breach of partnership and fiduciary duties in a luxury goods resale business. The court addressed claims of diversion of partnership assets and breach of the duty of good faith between business partners.

What was decided in [2026] SGHC 17?

[2026] SGHC 17 (GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 23 January 2026 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically judgments and orders. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.

Who were the parties in GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee ([2026] SGHC 17)?

The plaintiff in [2026] SGHC 17 was Illume Holding Pte Ltd, Unum In Infinitum Inc, and the defendant was Ian McKee. Legal representation included Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and PD Legal. The case was decided on 23 January 2026 in the High Court (General Division).