DQR & Anor v DQT
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Vinodh Coomaraswamy |
| Charges / claim | Arbitration |
| Counsel | Drew & Napier LLC, WongPartnership LLP, Cavinder Bull, Daniel Cai, Daryl Wong, Sean Tan, Wee Min, Wendy Lin |
Source: [2026] SGHC 23, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHC 23 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 28 January 2026 concerning Arbitration, specifically addressing award. The judgment was delivered by Vinodh Coomaraswamy. The case was brought by DQR and others (plaintiff) against DQT (defendant). Legal representation was provided by WongPartnership LLP and Drew & Napier LLC. The judgment cites 3 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the Arbitration Act, the Companies Act, and the International Arbitration Act.
[2026] SGHC 23 explained
DQR & Anor v DQT ([2026] SGHC 23) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 28 January 2026. It is categorised under Arbitration. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 23 about?
DQR & Anor v DQT ([2026] SGHC 23) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Arbitration - Award - Recourse against award - Setting aside”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 23 consider?
The judgment refers to Arbitration Act (Cap 10), Companies Act (Cap 50), International Arbitration Act (Cap 143A), and International Arbitration Act (Cap 10). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
Summary
DQR and another party sought declarations and relief against DQT in a dispute involving trust arrangements and beneficial ownership of assets. The court addressed issues of resulting trusts, constructive trusts, and the parties' respective beneficial interests in the disputed assets.
What was decided in [2026] SGHC 23?
[2026] SGHC 23 (DQR & Anor v DQT) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 28 January 2026 addressing Arbitration, specifically award. The judgment was delivered by Vinodh Coomaraswamy.
Who were the parties in DQR & Anor v DQT ([2026] SGHC 23)?
The plaintiff in [2026] SGHC 23 was DQR, DQS, and the defendant was DQT. Legal representation included WongPartnership LLP and Drew & Napier LLC. The case was decided on 28 January 2026 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 23?
[2026] SGHC 23 was delivered by Vinodh Coomaraswamy in the High Court (General Division) on 28 January 2026. The case concerned Arbitration.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGHC 23 cite?
[2026] SGHC 23 cites 3 prior decisions. It references Arbitration Act, Companies Act, International Arbitration Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (3)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 23)