LINKCHINA CAPITAL PTE. LTD. v SPARROW TECH PRIVATE LIMITED
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Lee Seiu Kin |
| Charges / claim | Contract |
| Counsel | Harry Elias Partnership LLP, Rajah & Tann LLP, Alicia Tan Ruimin, Cheng Wai Yuen Mark, Lem Jit Min Andy, Lim Wee Teck Darren, Lin Shuang Ju, Poon Pui Yee |
Source: [2026] SGHC 29, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (8)
Case Significance
[2026] SGHC 29 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 6 February 2026 concerning Contract, specifically addressing contractual terms. The judgment was delivered by Lee Seiu Kin. The case was brought by LinkChina Capital Pte Ltd (plaintiff) against Sparrow Tech Pte Ltd (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Rajah & Tann LLP and Harry Elias Partnership LLP.
[2026] SGHC 29 explained
LINKCHINA CAPITAL PTE. LTD. v SPARROW TECH PRIVATE LIMITED ([2026] SGHC 29) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 6 February 2026. It is categorised under Contract. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 29 about?
LINKCHINA CAPITAL PTE. LTD. v SPARROW TECH PRIVATE LIMITED ([2026] SGHC 29) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Contract — Contractual terms — Express terms”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
Linkchina Capital sued Sparrow Tech in a commercial dispute involving allegations of breach of agreement and misrepresentation. The court considered whether the statutory demand should be set aside and the appropriate relief.
What was decided in [2026] SGHC 29?
[2026] SGHC 29 (LINKCHINA CAPITAL PTE. LTD. v SPARROW TECH PRIVATE LIMITED) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 6 February 2026 addressing Contract, specifically contractual terms. The judgment was delivered by Lee Seiu Kin.
Who were the parties in LINKCHINA CAPITAL PTE. LTD. v SPARROW TECH PRIVATE LIMITED ([2026] SGHC 29)?
The plaintiff in [2026] SGHC 29 was LinkChina Capital Pte Ltd, and the defendant was Sparrow Tech Pte Ltd. Legal representation included Rajah & Tann LLP and Harry Elias Partnership LLP. The case was decided on 6 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).
Which judge decided [2026] SGHC 29?
[2026] SGHC 29 was delivered by Lee Seiu Kin in the High Court (General Division) on 6 February 2026. The case concerned Contract.
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Legal concepts & references
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 29)