GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee

[2026] SGHC 40 High Court (General Division) 20 February 2026 HC/OC 823/2023 ( HC/SUM 3351/2025 ) 4 min read

1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Key facts

Court	High Court (General Division)
Decided	20 February 2026
Judge	Choo Han Teck
Charges / claim	Civil Procedure
Counsel	Eugene Thuraisingam LLP, PD Legal, Gerard Quek Wen Jiang, Glenn Chua Ze Xuan, Hamza Zafar Malik, Suang Wijaya

Source: [2026] SGHC 40, High Court (General Division), decided 20 February 2026 — eLitigation. Updated 10 July 2026.

Catchwords

Civil Procedure — Costs

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Choo Han Teck Delivered

Counsel (6)

Eugene Thuraisingam LLP Firm PD Legal Firm Gerard Quek Wen Jiang Counsel Defendant Glenn Chua Ze Xuan Counsel Defendant Hamza Zafar Malik Counsel Plaintiff Suang Wijaya Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (5)

Illume Holding Pte Ltd Plaintiff Unum In Infinitum Inc Plaintiff Daniel Maag Plaintiff Gurpreet Gill Maag Plaintiff Ian McKee Defendant

Case Significance

[2026] SGHC 40 is a High Court (General Division) decision dated 20 February 2026 concerning Civil Procedure, specifically addressing costs. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck. The case was brought by Illume Holding Pte Ltd and others (plaintiff) against Ian McKee (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and PD Legal. The judgment cites 1 case (0 Singapore, 1 foreign).

[2026] SGHC 40 explained

GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee ([2026] SGHC 40) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 20 February 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.

What is [2026] SGHC 40 about?

GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee ([2026] SGHC 40) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Costs”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.

Summary

Gurpreet Gill Maag and three others brought further proceedings against Ian McKee in a dispute arising from a business relationship. The court addressed additional claims related to the underlying commercial dispute and the appropriate relief.

What was decided in [2026] SGHC 40?

[2026] SGHC 40 (GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 20 February 2026 addressing Civil Procedure, specifically costs. The judgment was delivered by Choo Han Teck.

Who were the parties in GURPREET GILL MAAG & 3 Ors v Ian McKee ([2026] SGHC 40)?

The plaintiff in [2026] SGHC 40 was Illume Holding Pte Ltd, Unum In Infinitum Inc, and the defendant was Ian McKee. Legal representation included Eugene Thuraisingam LLP and PD Legal. The case was decided on 20 February 2026 in the High Court (General Division).