PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Hossain Mohammad Azim
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Audrey Lim |
| Charges / claim | Criminal Law |
| Counsel | Anitha & Asoka LLC, Attorney-General's Chambers, Bonsai Law Corporation, Alexandria Shamini Joseph, Asoka s/o Markandu, Lee Shen Han, Sunil Nair |
Source: [2026] SGHC 51, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
[2026] SGHC 51 explained
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Hossain Mohammad Azim ([2026] SGHC 51) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 6 March 2026. It is categorised under Criminal Law. Within this corpus it has since been cited by 1 other reported Singapore judgment, a measure of how often later decisions have referred to it. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 51 about?
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v Hossain Mohammad Azim ([2026] SGHC 51) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Criminal Law — Offences — Sexual offences” and “Criminal Law — Offences — Criminal intimidation”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHC 51 consider?
The judgment refers to Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 68), Evidence Act (Cap 97), and Penal Code (Cap 224). The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHC 51 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 2. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
How influential is [2026] SGHC 51?
Within this corpus, [2026] SGHC 51 has been cited by 1 later reported Singapore judgment. That count reflects references from other decisions held in this corpus only and is a conservative lower bound on how often the case has actually been cited.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (26)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Referenced in
Statutes interpreted in this judgment
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 51)