Neo San San Cecilia v Loh Soo Chuan
Key facts
| Court | High Court (General Division) |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Tan Siong Thye |
| Charges / claim | Contract |
| Counsel | Terra Law LLC, Alson Tan Yun Hao, Yong Shu Wei Christopher |
Source: [2026] SGHC 54, High Court (General Division), decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (3)
Parties (2)
[2026] SGHC 54 explained
Neo San San Cecilia v Loh Soo Chuan ([2026] SGHC 54) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court (General Division) on 11 March 2026. It is categorised under Contract. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHC 54 about?
Neo San San Cecilia v Loh Soo Chuan ([2026] SGHC 54) is a High Court (General Division) decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Contract — Loan agreement – Whether the loan was repaid”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHC 54)