LATERAL SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) v RAYMOND LOW TUCK LOONG
Featured in the weekly digest — week of 8–14 June 2026 →
Key facts
| Court | High Court Registrar |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Perry Peh |
| Charges / claim | Civil Procedure, Limitation of Actions |
| Counsel | Salem Ibrahim LLC, Shook Lin & Bok LLP, Leong Kit Weng, Ng Yeow Khoon, Salem Ibrahim, Sherman Ho, Wang Tianyi |
Source: [2026] SGHCR 18, High Court Registrar, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Case Significance
Lateral Solutions Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Raymond Low Tuck Loong [2026] SGHCR 18, decided by Assistant Registrar Perry Peh on 8 June 2026 following hearings on 23 March and 30 April 2026, arose from HC/OC 967/2025, a claim by the liquidator of Lateral Solutions Pte Ltd ("LSPL") to recover S$1,269,157.82 and US$765,261.37 from Raymond Low Tuck Loong, a former director, alleged to have caused LSPL to advance these sums as loans to LSW Pte Ltd with no intention of repayment. LSPL relied on findings from an earlier minority oppression action, HC/S 238/2017, in which Mr Low was found to have acted in a commercially unfair manner. The judgment, addressing striking out and limitation issues under section 22(1) of the Limitation Act 1959 concerning trust property, cites 34 authorities — 30 Singapore and 4 foreign — and four statutes including the Companies Act and the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act.
[2026] SGHCR 18 explained
LATERAL SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) v RAYMOND LOW TUCK LOONG ([2026] SGHCR 18) is a Singapore judgment decided by the High Court Registrar on 8 June 2026. It is categorised under Civil Procedure and Limitation of Actions. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGHCR 18 about?
LATERAL SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) v RAYMOND LOW TUCK LOONG ([2026] SGHCR 18) is a High Court Registrar decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Civil Procedure — Striking out” and “Limitation of Actions — Particular causes of action — Trust property — Section 22(1) of the Limitation Act 1959”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Which legislation does [2026] SGHCR 18 consider?
The judgment refers to Companies Act (Cap 50), Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act, Limitation Act (Cap 163), and Restructuring and Dissolution Act. The statutes cited are listed in full on this page, each linking to its primary text.
What earlier Singapore cases does [2026] SGHCR 18 cite?
Among the in-corpus authorities it refers to are [2025] SGHC 109 and [2025] SGHC 108. The complete list of cases cited, and of later cases that cite this decision, is shown on this page.
What did Lateral Solutions Pte Ltd (in liquidation) v Raymond Low Tuck Loong [2026] SGHCR 18 concern?
In [2026] SGHCR 18, AR Perry Peh addressed a liquidator's claim to recover S$1,269,157.82 and US$765,261.37 from former director Raymond Low Tuck Loong, alleged to have advanced the sums as loans to LSW Pte Ltd with no intention of repayment, breaching his fiduciary duties.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (34)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGHCR 18)