Singapore Court Judgments — Week of 8–14 June 2026
In the week of 8–14 June 2026 (8 June 2026–14 June 2026), 14 judgments were reported across the Singapore courts. This weekly digest lists the notable decisions and their verbatim dispositions, free to read.
Last updated
Week of 8–14 June 2026
14 reported judgmentsThe week of 8–14 June 2026 produced 14 reported judgments, with four each from the High Court (General Division) and the High Court Registrar, and two each from the District Court, the Magistrate Court, and the Small Claims Tribunal. High Court (General Division) judgments were concentrated in civil procedure, including one matter also raising conflict of laws issues in which an application was dismissed, alongside a separate criminal law matter. High Court Registrar judgments likewise centred on civil procedure, touching conflict of laws, landlord and tenant, and limitation of actions in individual matters.
Notable judgments this week
| Citation | Court | Judgment | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| [2026] SGHC 123 | SGHC | ANURAG AVULA & Anor v MATCHMOVE PAY PTE LTD Civil Procedure | — |
| [2026] SGHC 124 | SGHC | EXCHANGE UNION COMPANY & 3 Ors v WO QI & 11 Ors Conflict of Laws · Civil Procedure | Application dismissed |
| [2026] SGHC 125 | SGHC | EC-COUNCIL PTE LTD v WPP SINGAPORE PTE LTD Civil Procedure | — |
| [2026] SGHC 122 | SGHC | PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v BQG & Anor Criminal Law | — |
| [2026] SGHCR 19 | SGHCR | Paresh Tribhovan Jotangia & 3 Ors v Singapore Commodities Group Co., Pte. Ltd. & Anor Civil Procedure · Conflict of laws | — |
| [2026] SGHCR 21 | SGHCR | MARSH (SINGAPORE) PTE. LTD. v ALARIC LEE Civil Procedure | — |
| [2026] SGHCR 20 | SGHCR | TAN NG KUANG v PRINFU PTE. LTD. (f.k.a. PRINFU FAMILY OFFICE PTE. LTD.) Landlord and Tenant | — |
| [2026] SGHCR 18 | SGHCR | LATERAL SOLUTIONS PTE. LTD. (IN LIQUIDATION) v RAYMOND LOW TUCK LOONG Civil Procedure · Limitation of Actions | — |
Dispositions, in the court's words
“The application was dismissed in the first instance by a deputy judge who stated, inter alia, that while it may have been more convenient for the witnesses to attend proceedings in Guangzhou than Hong Kong, he was not satisfied that Guangzhou in the PRC was the more appropriate forum.”
Dispositions are quoted verbatim from the judgment text. They summarise the order made and are not legal advice.
Counsel and law firms this week
12 law firms and 12 counsel appeared in this week's reported judgments, counted by number of judgments and excluding the Attorney-General's Chambers.
Derived from 14 reported judgments with decision_date in 2026-06-08–2026-06-14 in the Singapore case-law corpus. Dispositions are verbatim from judgment_text (via case_outcome); counsel/firm lists are from case_entities, prosecutor-filtered (Attorney-General's Chambers excluded). Digest compiled . Notable judgments are selected by court seniority, citation frequency and disposition parseability.