Singapore Court Judgments — Week of 25–31 May 2026
In the week of 25–31 May 2026 (25 May 2026–31 May 2026), 10 judgments were reported across the Singapore courts. This weekly digest lists the notable decisions and their verbatim dispositions, free to read.
Last updated
Week of 25–31 May 2026
10 reported judgmentsThe week of 25–31 May 2026 produced 10 reported judgments, with six from the High Court (General Division), two from the Family Court, and single judgments from the Court of Appeal (International) and the District Court. The High Court (General Division) dismissed an application in a matter concerning constitutional law and criminal procedure and sentencing, and allowed an appeal in a matter concerning criminal procedure and sentencing and road traffic. Further General Division judgments addressed civil procedure and legal profession issues, criminal procedure and sentencing, companies, contract, and trusts, and criminal law, evidence, and criminal procedure and sentencing. The Court of Appeal (International) heard an arbitration matter, and the District Court heard a matter concerning tort and employment law.
Notable judgments this week
| Citation | Court | Judgment | Disposition |
|---|---|---|---|
| [2026] SGCA(I) 3 | SGCA(I) | ONI GLOBAL PTE LTD & Anor v GNC HOLDINGS, LLC Arbitration | — |
| [2026] SGHC 118 | SGHC | PAULUS TANNOS v Attorney-General of the Republic of Singapore Constitutional Law · Criminal Procedure and Sentencing | Application dismissed |
| [2026] SGHC 116 | SGHC | PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v GARRICK ENG KWAN MENG Criminal Procedure and Sentencing · Road Traffic | Appeal allowed |
| [2026] SGHC 119 | SGHC | DXB v DXC Civil Procedure · Legal Profession | — |
| [2026] SGHC 114 | SGHC | GE ZHI v ATTORNEY-GENERAL Criminal Procedure and Sentencing | — |
| [2026] SGHC 117 | SGHC | LEOW HOCK SOON & Anor v CHEW EIK KHOON & 2 Ors Companies · Contract · Trusts | — |
| [2026] SGHC 115 | SGHC | ANKIT SHARMA v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Criminal Law · Evidence · Criminal Procedure and Sentencing | — |
| [2026] SGDC 177 | SGDC | Nirmala D/O Thangavellu v Acestes Pte. Ltd. Tort · Employment Law | — |
Dispositions, in the court's words
“I dismiss the application for leave to commence judicial review proceedings.”
“I allowed the appeal and set aside the fine of $5,000 imposed by the DJ for the RTA Charge, substituting it with a term of four weeks’ imprisonment.”
Dispositions are quoted verbatim from the judgment text. They summarise the order made and are not legal advice.
Counsel and law firms this week
12 law firms and 12 counsel appeared in this week's reported judgments, counted by number of judgments and excluding the Attorney-General's Chambers.
Derived from 10 reported judgments with decision_date in 2026-05-25–2026-05-31 in the Singapore case-law corpus. Dispositions are verbatim from judgment_text (via case_outcome); counsel/firm lists are from case_entities, prosecutor-filtered (Attorney-General's Chambers excluded). Digest compiled . Notable judgments are selected by court seniority, citation frequency and disposition parseability.