Sarah Siaw Ming Hui
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Sarah Siaw Ming Hui. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Sarah Siaw Ming Hui appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2025–2026), before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, and Sarah Siaw Ming Hui acted for the respondent in 4 and the plaintiff in 1.
- Reported cases
- 6
- Courts
- High Court
- Period
- January 2025 to August 2026
Source: derived from 6 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Sarah Siaw Ming Hui — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Sarah Siaw Ming Hui appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 4 cases
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 1 case
- Counsel for the third party
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Application dismissed
- 1
- Convicted
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 6 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“For the above reasons, OA 961 is dismissed.”
High Court · 29 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 118 · Counsel for the respondent · Application dismissed -
“I convicted the accused on the charge of sexual assault involving penetration under s 376(2)(a) of the Penal Code.”
High Court · 5 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC 36 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Convicted
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Sarah Siaw Ming Hui practice?
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing 4 cases
Reported between November 2025 and August 2026.
Counsel for the respondent (4)
-
The court dismissed the application in its entirety and ordered the applicant to pay the respondent's costs on the standard basis, declining the request for indemnity costs.
High Court · 17 August 2026 · [2026] SGHC 168 -
The High Court dismissed OA 961 in full, refusing permission to commence judicial review and dismissing the application for an order for review of detention.
High Court · 29 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 118 -
The court dismissed the motion, finding no error in the district judge's decision to refuse bail pending the committal proceedings.
High Court · 26 May 2026 · [2026] SGHC 114 -
The High Court dismissed the criminal motion, finding no error in the District Judge's refusal of bail and so no basis to exercise its revisionary jurisdiction.
High Court · 21 November 2025 · [2025] SGHC 229
Counsel for the plaintiff (1)
-
The High Court convicted the accused of sexual assault involving penetration under s 376(2)(a) of the Penal Code and sentenced him to 13.5 years' imprisonment with an additional six months in lieu of…
High Court · 5 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC 36
Counsel for the third party (1)
-
The High Court dismissed the application for ad hoc admission, with costs of $8,000 all-in ordered against UTSS as the true party to the application rather than against the applicant.
High Court · 16 January 2025 · [2025] SGHC 9