Singapore Court Judgments — Week of 18–24 May 2026

In the week of 18–24 May 2026 (18 May 2026–24 May 2026), 18 judgments were reported across the Singapore courts. This weekly digest lists the notable decisions and their verbatim dispositions, free to read.

Last updated

Week of 18–24 May 2026

18 reported judgments

The week of 18–24 May 2026 produced 18 reported judgments, with nine from the High Court (General Division), three from the District Court, two each from the Court of Appeal and the High Court Registrar, and single judgments from the Family Court and the High Court (Family Division). The Court of Appeal allowed an appeal in a trusts matter and separately heard a criminal law matter, while the High Court (General Division) dismissed appeals in two matters concerning criminal law and criminal procedure and sentencing. Further General Division judgments addressed civil procedure and res judicata, arbitration, criminal procedure and sentencing together with criminal law, and civil procedure and statutory interpretation.

Notable judgments this week

CitationCourtJudgmentDisposition
[2026] SGCA 27SGCAWong Mei Lee, Millie v Jake Ngor Shing Rong
Trusts
Appeal allowed
[2026] SGCA 23SGCALow Sze Song v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Criminal Law
[2026] SGHC 113SGHCJEH v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing · Criminal Law
Appeal dismissed
[2026] SGHC 107SGHCLING ZHAO BIN v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Criminal Law · Criminal Procedure and Sentencing
Appeal dismissed
[2026] SGHC 112SGHCDjony Gunawan v Christina Lesmana
Civil Procedure · Res Judicata
[2026] SGHC 100SGHCJXC Pte. Ltd. v Thye Chuan Engineering Construction Co. Pte Ltd.
Arbitration
[2026] SGHC 110SGHCGALVEZ MARY JOE BLANCO v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing · Criminal Law
[2026] SGHC 111SGHCFRANK LEE v INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH & 9 Ors
Civil Procedure · Statutory Interpretation

Dispositions, in the court's words

“we allow the appeal.”

“I dismissed the appeal.”

“I dismissed the appeal.”

Dispositions are quoted verbatim from the judgment text. They summarise the order made and are not legal advice.

Derived from 18 reported judgments with decision_date in 2026-05-18–2026-05-24 in the Singapore case-law corpus. Dispositions are verbatim from judgment_text (via case_outcome); counsel/firm lists are from case_entities, prosecutor-filtered (Attorney-General's Chambers excluded). Digest compiled . Notable judgments are selected by court seniority, citation frequency and disposition parseability.

Other weeks