J

JFN Chambers LLC

4 reported cases 2 counsel named

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name JFN Chambers LLC. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory or the firm's website.

JFN Chambers LLC appears in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026), most often before the SGHC.

These cases span several subject areas, including Admiralty and Shipping, Insolvency Law and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, and JFN Chambers LLC acted for the third party in 1 and the respondent in 1.

Reported cases
4
Courts
SGHC, SGCA
Period
February 2024 to June 2026

Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

JFN Chambers LLC — Reported Cases & Litigation History

How JFN Chambers LLC appeared

Counsel for the claimants
1 case
Counsel for the third party
1 case
Counsel for the young independent counsel
1 case
Counsel for the respondent
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Application dismissed
1
Appeal dismissed
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 4 cases.

What the courts decided

[2026] SGHC 124 Application dismissed

“In conclusion, the Stay Applications are dismissed.”

EXCHANGE UNION COMPANY & 3 Ors v WO QI & 11 Ors · SGHC · · Counsel for the claimants
[2025] SGCA 29 Appeal dismissed

“…we dismiss the appeals.”

NATIXIS, SINGAPORE BRANCH v SESHADRI RAJAGOPALAN & 2 Ors · SGCA · · Counsel for the third party

Parties in these cases

SEAX Malaysia Sdn Bhd1 Super Sea Cable Networks Pte Ltd1 Sacofa Sdn Bhd1 Ang Boon Han1 Wo Quan1 Jumbo Access Investments Limited1 Create Fortune Pte Ltd1 W3 Cap Holding Co Ltd1

What areas of law does JFN Chambers LLC specialize in?

Counsel named in these judgments (2)

Lawyers recorded as counsel from JFN Chambers LLC in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.

4
Cases
2
Counsel named
4
Appearances

All reported cases (4)

Rankings

Most active law firms by reported court cases →