HAMPTON PROPERTY GROUP v MARX AURNHAMMER WERNER JOHANNES
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
[2026] SGMC 5 is a Magistrate Court decision dated 13 January 2026 concerning Contract and Statutory Interpretation, specifically addressing s 44 of the estate agents act 2010 and contractual terms. The judgment was delivered by Sim Mei Ling. The case was brought by Hampton Property Group (plaintiff) against Marx Aurnhammer Werner Johannes (defendant). Legal representation was provided by Kana & Co. The judgment cites 3 cases and references 3 statutory provisions, including the EA Act, the Estate Agents Act, and the Evidence Act.
Summary
Hampton Property Group sued Marx Aurnhammer Werner Johannes in a property-related dispute involving claims for breach of contract. The Magistrate's Court assessed the contractual obligations and determined the parties' respective rights and liabilities.
What was decided in [2026] SGMC 5?
[2026] SGMC 5 (HAMPTON PROPERTY GROUP v MARX AURNHAMMER WERNER JOHANNES) is a Magistrate Court decision from 13 January 2026 addressing Contract and Statutory Interpretation, specifically s 44 of the estate agents act 2010 and contractual terms. The judgment was delivered by Sim Mei Ling.
Who were the parties in HAMPTON PROPERTY GROUP v MARX AURNHAMMER WERNER JOHANNES?
The plaintiff in [2026] SGMC 5 was Hampton Property Group, and the defendant was Marx Aurnhammer Werner Johannes. Legal representation included Kana & Co. The case was decided on 13 January 2026 in the Magistrate Court.
Which judge decided [2026] SGMC 5?
[2026] SGMC 5 was delivered by Sim Mei Ling in the Magistrate Court on 13 January 2026. The case concerned Contract and Statutory Interpretation.
What cases and statutes does [2026] SGMC 5 cite?
[2026] SGMC 5 cites 3 prior decisions. It references EA Act, Estate Agents Act, Evidence Act.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (3)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGMC 5)