Leading Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments Lawyers & Firms by Reported Cases — Singapore
6 reported cases · August 2023 to July 2025
Updated
What did Singapore courts decide in Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments?
Singapore courts issued 6 reported Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments judgments (2023–2025), most in the Court of Appeal (3), of the 2 whose outcome could be read from the judgment, the most common was Appeal dismissed (2), one monetary award was recorded, of $100,000. This is a descriptive summary of what the courts recorded in reported decisions, not legal advice.
Compiled from 6 reported Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments judgments published on eLitigation. Counts and figures are derived from the judgments themselves; the Attorney-General's Chambers is excluded from the counsel and firm counts as the public prosecutor.
Outcome data updated
Across 6 reported Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments judgments in Singapore courts (August 2023 to July 2025). The lists below count how often named firms and lawyers appear in reported decisions — a descriptive count of activity, not an assessment of quality or standing.
Overview
Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments appears in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025).
Which law firms handle the most Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments cases in Singapore?
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP (2 cases), Focus Law Asia LLC (2 cases) and WongPartnership LLP (2 cases) appear as a firm on record in reported Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments cases between August 2023 and July 2025. 20 firms appeared in Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments cases during this period.
Who are the leading Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments lawyers in Singapore?
Khoo Ching Shin Shem (2 cases), Teo Jia Hui Veronica (2 cases) and Ng Wei Kit Joshua (2 cases) appear as counsel in reported Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments cases between August 2023 and July 2025.
Which judges handle the most Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments cases in Singapore?
Sundaresh Menon (3 cases), Belinda Ang Saw Ean (3 cases) and Steven Chong (2 cases) appear on the bench in reported Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments cases between August 2023 and July 2025.
How many Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments cases are reported in Singapore courts?
6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025) involve Bills of Exchange and Other Negotiable Instruments.
Case Volume by Year
Key Issues & Sub-Topics
Letter of credit transaction 2 cases
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and ordered UniCredit to pay Glencore costs of $100,000, including disbursements, with the usual consequential orders.
Court of Appeal · 28 November 2023 · [2023] SGCA 41 -
The Court of Appeal allowed CACIB's appeals solely on the ground that PPT had breached its warranty of marketable title in the LOI, and gave judgment for CACIB in the sum of US$10,319,470.81, subject…
Court of Appeal (International) · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGCA(I) 7
Letter of credit transaction — Presentation of letter of indemnity — Whether representations in letter of indemnity were false — Whether representor made representations with no honest belief in their truth — Whether documents presented to issuing bank contained representations made to the issuing bank 1 case
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because the representation was neither false nor fraudulently made, and ordered BCP Geneva to pay CAO costs fixed at $100,000 (all-in).
Court of Appeal · 7 July 2025 · [2025] SGCA 33
Letter of credit transaction — Fraud exception 1 case
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals, holding that the High Court did not err in finding that the Fraud Exception had been made out.
Court of Appeal · 21 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 31
Letter of credit transaction — Nullity exception 1 case
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals, holding that the High Court did not err in finding that the Fraud Exception had been made out.
Court of Appeal · 21 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 31
Letter of credit transaction — Whether issuing bank having cause of action in negligent misrepresentation against beneficiary for misrepresentation made in document presented to issuing bank 1 case
-
Goh Yihan J dismissed all of BCP's claims against CAO.
High Court · 5 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 145
Letter of credit transaction — Whether fraud exception established — Whether representation made in document presented to confirming bank was false — Whether beneficiary made representation without belief in its truth 1 case
-
Goh Yihan J dismissed all of BCP's claims against CAO.
High Court · 5 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 145
Letter of credit transaction — Whether fraud exception established — Whether representation made in document presented to issuing bank was false — Whether beneficiary made representation without belief in its truth 1 case
-
Andre Maniam J dismissed Winson's claims against both banks because the fraud exception was established, and awarded the banks their costs.
High Court · 18 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 220
Key Statutes
Court Distribution
Cases
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal because the representation was neither false nor fraudulently made, and ordered BCP Geneva to pay CAO costs fixed at $100,000 (all-in).
Court of Appeal · 7 July 2025 · [2025] SGCA 33 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals, holding that the High Court did not err in finding that the Fraud Exception had been made out.
Court of Appeal · 21 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 31 -
Goh Yihan J dismissed all of BCP's claims against CAO.
High Court · 5 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 145 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and ordered UniCredit to pay Glencore costs of $100,000, including disbursements, with the usual consequential orders.
Court of Appeal · 28 November 2023 · [2023] SGCA 41 -
The Court of Appeal allowed CACIB's appeals solely on the ground that PPT had breached its warranty of marketable title in the LOI, and gave judgment for CACIB in the sum of US$10,319,470.81, subject…
Court of Appeal (International) · 24 October 2023 · [2023] SGCA(I) 7 -
Andre Maniam J dismissed Winson's claims against both banks because the fraud exception was established, and awarded the banks their costs.
High Court · 18 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 220
Methodology & disclaimer
Firms and lawyers are ranked by the number of reported Singapore court judgments they appear in, published on eLitigation. Counts reflect appearances in reported decisions only — unreported matters, settlements, and advisory work are not included. This is a descriptive count of activity by reported case volume, not an assessment of quality or standing, and not an endorsement or recommendation of any firm or lawyer. It is information, not legal advice.