Kenneth Tan Partnership
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Kenneth Tan Partnership. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory or the firm's website.
Kenneth Tan Partnership appears in 16 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, Tort and Contract, and Kenneth Tan Partnership acted for the respondent in 5 and the plaintiff in 4.
- Reported cases
- 16
- Courts
- High Court, Court of Appeal, High Court (Appellate Division), High Court Registrar
- Period
- January 2023 to September 2026
Source: derived from 16 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Kenneth Tan Partnership — Reported Cases & Litigation History
How Kenneth Tan Partnership appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 5 cases
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 4 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 3 cases
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the third party
- 1 case
- Counsel for the first defendant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 2
- Application allowed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 3 of the 16 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“…we dismiss the appeal and award costs to Hanjin in the sum of S$60,000 including disbursements.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 16 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 26 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed -
“…we dismiss the appeals on the basis that the court below did not err in finding that Fraud Exception has been made out.”
Court of Appeal · 21 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 31 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed -
“For all the reasons above, I allow the Application, including the Ancillary Orders sought.”
High Court · 25 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC 84 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Application allowed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Kenneth Tan Partnership specialize in?
Civil Procedure 7 cases
Reported between January 2023 and July 2024.
Tort 5 cases
Reported between September 2023 and January 2026.
Counsel named in these judgments (3)
Lawyers recorded as counsel from Kenneth Tan Partnership in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.
All reported cases (16)
-
The High Court allowed the application in HC/SUM 2669/2026 and ordered that three insolvency practitioners of KPMG Services Pte Ltd be appointed joint and several interim judicial managers of the…
High Court · 25 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 200 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed Valency's appeal in CA 31 and allowed Oldendorff's appeal in CA 32, holding that neither release instruction was an act of conversion and that Valency in any event…
Court of Appeal · 12 January 2026 · [2026] SGCA 1 -
The Court of Appeal (Steven Chong JCA delivering the judgment, with Sundaresh Menon CJ and Ang Cheng Hock J) dismissed both appeals, upholding Maersk's liability for breach of the contracts of…
Court of Appeal · 5 September 2025 · [2025] SGCA 42 -
The court allowed the claim in part: it dismissed Valency's claims against JSW and Oldendorff and granted judgment for Valency against Unicorn for conversion of 38,000MT in the sum of USD2,694,451…
High Court · 28 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC 50 -
The Appellate Division dismissed the appeal and ordered Seatrium to pay Hanjin costs of S$60,000 including disbursements, with the usual consequential orders.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 16 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 26 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals, holding that the High Court did not err in finding that the Fraud Exception had been made out.
Court of Appeal · 21 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 31 -
Aedit Abdullah J dismissed KPMG's striking out application, finding that the Statement of Claim disclosed a reasonable cause of action in contract.
High Court · 10 July 2024 · [2024] SGHC 176 -
The court allowed the application, ordering that the two suits be tried jointly before the same Judge, and granted the ancillary orders sought.
High Court · 25 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC 84 -
Vinodh Coomaraswamy J in substance dismissed both appeals.
High Court · 31 January 2024 · [2024] SGHC 11 -
The Court of Appeal (Sundaresh Menon CJ, Steven Chong JCA and Belinda Ang Saw Ean JCA) held that the appeal was confined to the two questions, answered them in the affirmative by approving the Mode…
Court of Appeal · 30 November 2023 · [2023] SGCA 43 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and ordered UniCredit to pay Glencore costs of $100,000, including disbursements, with the usual consequential orders.
Court of Appeal · 28 November 2023 · [2023] SGCA 41 -
The High Court held that the gift had not lapsed and ordered that the property, through its sale proceeds, vest in NUHSF under the gift clause, rejecting the executrix's position that the gift fell…
High Court · 28 November 2023 · [2023] SGHC 336 -
The court agreed with the assistant registrar that the four requests were requests for evidence, and dismissed KPMG's appeal.
High Court · 27 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 270 -
S Mohan J found that the works were defective and that Hanjin breached the sub-contract, but held that no tortious duty of care arose and that the Side Letter precluded the claim.
High Court · 20 September 2023 · [2023] SGHC 264 -
Goh Yihan JC allowed the plaintiffs' appeal.
High Court · 28 April 2023 · [2023] SGHC 113 -
The Assistant Registrar allowed the application, struck out both defendants' defences and entered judgment against D1 for USD 63,303,806.66 with interest and costs.
High Court Registrar · 30 January 2023 · [2023] SGHCR 1
In the court record
The reported judgments Kenneth Tan Partnership appears in are aggregated on the practice-area court records below, each of which sets out the firms that appear most often in that area of the reported record.
- In Tort Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Kenneth Tan Partnership is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
- In Credit and Security Lawyers in Singapore: The Court Record, Kenneth Tan Partnership is among the firms that appear most often in the reported judgments.
These appearances also feed the Largest Law Firms in Singapore, Ranked by Reported Court Cases, the site-wide court-record ranking of Singapore firms by the number of reported judgments in which they appear.