D

Dauntless Law Chambers LLC

3 reported cases 5 counsel named

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Dauntless Law Chambers LLC. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Dauntless Law Chambers LLC appears in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2026), most often before the SGHCR.

These cases are classified under Civil Procedure, Contract and Conflict of Laws, and Dauntless Law Chambers LLC acted for the defendant in 1 and the plaintiff in 1.

Reported cases
3
Courts
SGHCR, SGHC
Period
April 2026 to September 2026

Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Dauntless Law Chambers LLC — Reported Cases & Litigation History

How Dauntless Law Chambers LLC appeared

Counsel for the defendant
1 case
Counsel for the plaintiff
1 case
Counsel for the applicant
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Application allowed
1

Disposition recorded in 1 of 3 cases.

What the courts decided

[2026] SGHCR 10 Application allowed

“For the foregoing reasons, I set aside the service effected on Mr Muruthi on the basis that, having not obtained permission to serve OA 1158 out of the jurisdiction on Mr Muruthi, Mr Beranek had no right to serve OA 1158 on Mr Muruthi as the latter was not present in Singapore at the time of service.”

Michal Beranek v Sreerangam Muruthi & 2 Ors · SGHCR · · Counsel for the applicant

Parties in these cases

LSCS Pte Ltd1 Rasheed Thaiyar Mohamed1 Sreerangam Muruthi1 Michal Beranek1 Erin Koo Kee Hoon1 Hong Qi Yu1 Chen Yuanjing1 Peter McCorkindale1

What areas of law does Dauntless Law Chambers LLC specialize in?

Counsel named in these judgments (5)

Lawyers recorded as counsel from Dauntless Law Chambers LLC in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.

3
Cases
5
Counsel named
3
Appearances

All reported cases (3)

Rankings

Most active law firms by reported court cases →