V

Vinit Chhabra Law Corporation

4 reported cases 2 counsel named

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Vinit Chhabra Law Corporation. It is not a directory listing. Names, firm names and counsel appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current lawyers and contact details, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Vinit Chhabra Law Corporation appears in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025), most often before the SGHC.

These cases are classified under Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure and Sentencing and Family Law, and Vinit Chhabra Law Corporation acted for the defendant in 2 and the appellant in 1.

Reported cases
4
Courts
SGHC, SGCA, SGHCF
Period
September 2024 to August 2025

Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Vinit Chhabra Law Corporation — Reported Cases & Litigation History

How Vinit Chhabra Law Corporation appeared

Counsel for the defendant
2 cases
Counsel for the appellant
1 case
Counsel for the accused
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal dismissed
1
Sentence imposed
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 4 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGCA 38 Appeal dismissed

“We therefore dismiss the appeal against conviction and sentence.”

CHJ v PUBLIC PROSECUTOR · SGCA · · Counsel for the appellant
[2024] SGHC 240 Sentence imposed

“I sentenced the Accused to seven years’ imprisonment and three strokes of the cane for each of the SAP Charge, and 12 months’ imprisonment for the Obstruction Charge.”

PUBLIC PROSECUTOR v CHJ · SGHC · · Counsel for the accused

Parties in these cases

CHJ2 Wong Shi Xiang1 Foo Li Ping1 XNN1 XNM1

What areas of law does Vinit Chhabra Law Corporation specialize in?

Counsel named in these judgments (2)

Lawyers recorded as counsel from Vinit Chhabra Law Corporation in at least one reported judgment, with the years they appear. Not a current staff list.

Vinit Chhabra 2024–2025
Chhabra Vinit 2025
4
Cases
2
Counsel named
4
Appearances

All reported cases (4)

Rankings

Most active law firms by reported court cases →