C

Chan Cong Yen Lionel

Oon & Bazul LLP · 2023–2025 Called to the Bar in 2011 6 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Chan Cong Yen Lionel. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Chan Cong Yen Lionel appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the SGHC.

These cases span several subject areas, most often Arbitration and Civil Procedure, and Chan Cong Yen Lionel acted for the respondent in 5 and the plaintiff in 1.

Reported cases
6
Courts
SGHC, SGHC(A), SGCA
Period
March 2023 to May 2025

Source: derived from 6 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Chan Cong Yen Lionel — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Chan Cong Yen Lionel appeared

Counsel for the respondent
5 cases
Counsel for the plaintiff
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal dismissed
2

Disposition recorded in 2 of 6 cases.

What the courts decided

[2024] SGCA 19 Appeal dismissed

“We therefore dismissed the appeal, and fixed costs in favour of the respondent in the aggregate sum of $60,000.”

DBL v DBM · SGCA · · Counsel for the respondent
[2023] SGHC(A) 25 Appeal dismissed

“For the abovementioned reasons, both the application in OA 6 and the appeal in AD 8 are accordingly dismissed.”

RAMESH VANGAL v INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK · SGHC(A) · · Counsel for the respondent

Parties in these cases

Gupta Vaibhav1 Green Mint Pte Ltd1 UCO Bank, Singapore Branch1 Arvind Sharma1 Sidney Sridhar1 Seabulk Inc. (formerly known as Seabulk Systems Inc.)1 Indian Overseas Bank1 Ramesh Vangal1

What areas of law does Chan Cong Yen Lionel practice?

Arbitration 2 cases

Reported between May 2024 and August 2024.

Civil Procedure 2 cases

Reported between March 2023 and July 2023.

6
Appearances
2011
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondent (5)

Counsel for the plaintiff (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →