Eomer Holding Pte Ltd v Junie Lim Lay Peng & Anor
Key facts
| Court | Magistrate Court |
|---|---|
| Decided | |
| Judge | Andrew Tan Shao Weng |
| Charges / claim | Property |
| Counsel | Lee & Lee LLP, SC Wong Law Chambers LLC, Cheryl Sim Yin Ching, Quek Mong Hua, Tan Yong Quan, Wong Soo Chih |
Source: [2026] SGMC 111, Magistrate Court, decided — eLitigation. Updated .
Catchwords
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Parties (3)
Case Significance
Eomer Holding Pte Ltd v Junie Lim Lay Peng & Anor [2026] SGMC 111 was decided by District Judge Andrew Tan Shao Weng in the Magistrate's Court on 18 September 2026. The claimant leased 37B Mosque Street from the defendants under a lease dated 21 March 2023 at a monthly rent of $8,000. A leak from 28 June 2023 rendered the third floor, used as a meeting room, unusable until works ended on 24 October 2023. The issues were breach of the repair obligation, noise, loss of manhours, rent arrears and fire insurance. The court found breach of clause 3(c), awarded damages of $10,360 by proportionate reduction of rent, allowed the counterclaim for $26,000 in arrears with interest of $5,776.99, and disallowed the other claims.
[2026] SGMC 111 explained
Eomer Holding Pte Ltd v Junie Lim Lay Peng & Anor ([2026] SGMC 111) is a Singapore judgment decided by the Magistrate Court on 18 September 2026. It is categorised under Property. It is a recent decision; within this corpus no later judgment has cited it yet. This page summarises what the reported decision covers and links the primary sources — the full judgment, the statutes it cites, and the other cases it engages with — so the decision can be read in context. It is reference information, not legal advice, and it does not state the outcome or any holding beyond what the official judgment records.
What is [2026] SGMC 111 about?
Eomer Holding Pte Ltd v Junie Lim Lay Peng & Anor ([2026] SGMC 111) is a Magistrate Court decision from 2026. Its published catchwords are “Property – Lease – Damages”, which indicate the subject matter the judgment addresses. The full reasoning and orders are in the judgment itself, linked below.
Summary
The Magistrate's Court heard a tenancy dispute in which the claimant, Eomer Holding Pte Ltd, sued its landlords over a roof leak at 37B Mosque Street, and the landlords counterclaimed for rent arrears. The court found the defendants breached clause 3(c) of the tenancy agreement, as the third floor was unusable from 28 June 2023 to 24 October 2023, and awarded the claimant $10,360 (35 percent of rent of $29,600). The defendants were awarded $26,000 in rental arrears and contractual interest of $5,776.99.
What was Eomer Holding Pte Ltd v Junie Lim Lay Peng about ([2026] SGMC 111)?
It was a tenancy dispute over a roof leak at 37B Mosque Street. The claimant sought damages for loss of use of the third floor, and the landlord defendants counterclaimed for unpaid rent and an alleged fire insurance breach.
How were damages assessed in [2026] SGMC 111?
The court awarded damages by proportionate reduction of rent, treating the third floor as 35 percent of the floor area. Damages of $10,360 were 35 percent of the rent of $29,600 for the material period.
Cases Cited (5)
Related cases
Other Singapore judgments involving the same parties or counsel.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Singapore Courts portal.
Read on eLitigationSource: eLitigation ([2026] SGMC 111)