Elsie Lim Yan
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Elsie Lim Yan. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Elsie Lim Yan appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Insolvency Law, and Elsie Lim Yan acted for the respondent in 1 and the non-party in 1.
- Reported cases
- 3
- Courts
- High Court, Court of Appeal
- Period
- April 2024 to June 2025
Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Elsie Lim Yan — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Elsie Lim Yan appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the non-party
- 1 case
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal allowed
- 1
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 3 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“…we allow the appeals of the Liquidator and the Company and set aside the orders made below.”
Court of Appeal · 20 June 2025 · [2025] SGCA 27 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed -
“I therefore dismissed the appeal.”
High Court · 12 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 101 · Counsel for the defendant · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Elsie Lim Yan practice?
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeals of the liquidator and the company, set aside the orders below and expunged the admitted amounts of Inner Mongolia's proof and Shenzhen's proof.
Court of Appeal · 20 June 2025 · [2025] SGCA 27
Counsel for the non-party (1)
-
The High Court dismissed both of the liquidator's applications to expunge the proofs of debt, and ordered costs fixed at $12,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid to each of Inner Mongolia and…
High Court · 26 June 2024 · [2024] SGHC 160
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The High Court dismissed the appeal and affirmed the summary judgment for the claimant in the sum of $451,089, holding the agreement enforceable in full.
High Court · 12 April 2024 · [2024] SGHC 101