Gerard Quek
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Gerard Quek. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Gerard Quek appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the High Court.
These cases are classified under Civil Procedure, Restitution and Limitation of Actions, and Gerard Quek acted for the third party in 1 and the claimant in 1.
Gerard Quek is counsel of record in 3 reported Singapore court judgments (including [2025] SGHC(I) 18). This page is the Singapore counsel of that name.
- Reported cases
- 3
- Courts
- High Court, Singapore International Commercial Court
- Period
- July 2023 to July 2025
Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Gerard Quek — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Gerard Quek appeared
- Counsel for the third party
- 1 case
- Counsel for the claimant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the applicant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Application dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 3 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I dismiss the application for permission of the General Division of the High Court to appeal.”
High Court · 19 July 2023 · [2023] SGHC 193 · Counsel for the applicant · Application dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Gerard Quek practice?
Counsel for the third party (1)
-
The court allowed TFL's application in part, declaring that SUM 19 was commenced in breach of ORC 13, striking it out and dismissing it as against TFL, and ordering that no one may take a step to…
Singapore International Commercial Court · 11 July 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 18
Counsel for the claimant (1)
-
The High Court dismissed the appeal in its entirety, upholding the striking out of the unjust enrichment claim and the other claims about the 2014 transfer, and refused the alternative amendments.
High Court · 4 September 2024 · [2024] SGHC 226
Counsel for the applicant (1)
-
Tan Siong Thye SJ, in an ex tempore judgment, found no prima facie error and no question of general principle decided for the first time, and dismissed the application for permission to appeal.
High Court · 19 July 2023 · [2023] SGHC 193