Jasmine Thng Khai Fang
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Jasmine Thng Khai Fang. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Jasmine Thng Khai Fang appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, and Jasmine Thng Khai Fang acted for the respondent in 1 and the defendant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court, Singapore International Commercial Court, Court of Appeal (International)
- Period
- May 2024 to December 2025
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Jasmine Thng Khai Fang — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Jasmine Thng Khai Fang appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the applicant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Application dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“…the application is dismissed.”
High Court · 17 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 255 · Counsel for the respondent · Application dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Jasmine Thng Khai Fang practice?
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The High Court dismissed the application, holding that the tribunal had jurisdiction over the arbitration.
High Court · 17 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 255
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The court ordered Udenna to pay PIMD's costs, assessed and fixed at S$321,992.33: S$246,992.33 for SUM 27 and S$75,000 for OA 4, SUM 11 and SUM 42.
Singapore International Commercial Court · 5 March 2025 · [2025] SGHC(I) 6
Counsel for the applicant (1)
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed the application for permission to appeal and ordered costs of USD 5,000 all-in against Udenna.
Court of Appeal (International) · 27 November 2024 · [2024] SGCA(I) 9
Counsel for the plaintiff (1)
-
The court found both Sun Travels and Siyam in contempt of court.
High Court · 9 May 2024 · [2024] SGHC 119