Jocelyn Teo
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Jocelyn Teo. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Jocelyn Teo appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Criminal Procedure and Sentencing and Criminal Law, and Jocelyn Teo acted for the respondent in 4 and the plaintiff in 1.
- Reported cases
- 5
- Courts
- High Court, Court of Appeal
- Period
- August 2024 to July 2026
Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Jocelyn Teo — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Jocelyn Teo appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 4 cases
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Sentence imposed
- 1
- Application dismissed
- 1
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 3 of the 5 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I sentenced the Accused to a term of imprisonment of 14 years and six months and caning of 12 strokes.”
High Court · 31 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 160 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Sentence imposed -
“For the reasons set out above, OA 1049 is dismissed.”
High Court · 6 March 2026 · [2026] SGHC 50 · Counsel for the respondent · Application dismissed -
“We therefore dismissed the appeal, and affirmed the aggregate sentence of 13 years’ imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane imposed in the court below.”
Court of Appeal · 14 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 29 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Jocelyn Teo practice?
Criminal Procedure and Sentencing 3 cases
Reported between August 2024 and March 2026.
Criminal Law 2 cases
Reported between August 2024 and July 2026.
Counsel for the plaintiff (1)
-
The court convicted the accused of rape and sentenced him to imprisonment for a term of 14 years and six months and caning of 12 strokes.
High Court · 31 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 160
Counsel for the respondent (4)
-
The High Court dismissed the application, leaving the registration of the French confiscation order in place.
High Court · 6 March 2026 · [2026] SGHC 50 -
The High Court (Chua Lee Ming J) dismissed the application for permission to seek judicial review and ordered the applicant to pay costs fixed at $8,000 including disbursements.
High Court · 15 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC 11 -
The court dismissed the application summarily, without an oral hearing, under s 60G(8) of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969.
Court of Appeal · 3 October 2024 · [2024] SGCA 38 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal on 26 June 2024 and affirmed the aggregate sentence of 13 years' imprisonment and 16 strokes of the cane, giving its grounds later.
Court of Appeal · 14 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 29