Kirsten Siow
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Kirsten Siow. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Kirsten Siow appears as counsel of record in 5 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, including Contract, Legal Profession and Arbitration, and Kirsten Siow acted for the appellant in 2 and the applicant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 5
- Courts
- High Court, Court of Appeal, High Court Registrar
- Period
- December 2023 to December 2025
Source: derived from 5 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Kirsten Siow — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Kirsten Siow appeared
- Counsel for the appellant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the applicant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 3
Outcome recorded for 3 of the 5 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“The appeal is dismissed.”
High Court · 16 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 207 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed -
“…we dismiss the appeals on the basis that the court below did not err in finding that Fraud Exception has been made out.”
Court of Appeal · 21 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 31 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed -
“We therefore dismissed the appeal, and fixed costs in favour of the respondent in the aggregate sum of $60,000.”
Court of Appeal · 21 May 2024 · [2024] SGCA 19 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Kirsten Siow practice?
Counsel for the applicant (1)
-
The court found due cause shown and ordered that the respondent be suspended from practice for 12 months under s 83(1)(b) of the Legal Profession Act 1966, starting on 11 November 2025, the date of…
High Court · 8 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 230
Counsel for the appellant (2)
-
The High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the District Judge's findings that SearchAsia was entitled to the placement fee.
High Court · 16 October 2025 · [2025] SGHC 207 -
The Court of Appeal dismissed both appeals, holding that the High Court did not err in finding that the Fraud Exception had been made out.
Court of Appeal · 21 August 2024 · [2024] SGCA 31
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal at the hearing on 28 March 2024 and later gave its grounds.
Court of Appeal · 21 May 2024 · [2024] SGCA 19
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The Assistant Registrar allowed HKE's application and set aside the whole of JUD 252.
High Court Registrar · 27 December 2023 · [2023] SGHCR 22