Lee Yun Long
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Lee Yun Long. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Lee Yun Long appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the High Court.
These cases are classified under Building and Construction Law, Arbitration and Civil Procedure, and Lee Yun Long acted for the respondent in 3 and the plaintiff in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court, Court of Appeal
- Period
- February 2023 to January 2026
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Lee Yun Long — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Lee Yun Long appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 3 cases
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Claim allowed in part
- 1
- Appeal allowed in part
- 1
- Application dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 3 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“In conclusion, I award E-Tech: (a) $820,908.12 for Builder’s Works (inclusive of GST); (b) $63,903.64 for the Non-Builder’s Works (inclusive of GST); and (c) $177,851.08 for the Management Costs.”
High Court · 16 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC 12 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Claim allowed in part -
“We therefore allow the appeal in part.”
Court of Appeal · 13 February 2025 · [2025] SGCA 5 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed in part -
“In conclusion, I dismissed the setting-aside application in its entirety.”
High Court · 1 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC 112 · Counsel for the respondent · Application dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Lee Yun Long practice?
Counsel for the plaintiff (1)
-
The High Court allowed the claim in part.
High Court · 16 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC 12
Counsel for the respondent (3)
-
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal in part.
Court of Appeal · 13 February 2025 · [2025] SGCA 5 -
The High Court dismissed the setting-aside application in its entirety, so the question of remitting the award did not arise.
High Court · 1 February 2024 · [2024] SGHC 112 -
The court dismissed the appeal.
High Court · 27 February 2023 · [2023] SGHC 46