Lim Huat Sing Julian Sebastian
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Lim Huat Sing Julian Sebastian. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Lim Huat Sing Julian Sebastian appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), before the High Court.
These cases are classified under Contract, Courts and Jurisdiction and Civil Procedure, and Lim Huat Sing Julian Sebastian acted for the respondent in 2 and the defendant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 3
- Courts
- High Court
- Period
- August 2023 to January 2026
Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Lim Huat Sing Julian Sebastian — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Lim Huat Sing Julian Sebastian appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Application refused
- 1
- Appeal allowed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 3 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I reject the defendant’s request to make the instalment order sought in relation to costs of the appeal and the judgment sum arising from the underlying suit.”
High Court · 10 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 286 · Counsel for the respondent · Application refused -
“I allow the appeal on this basis.”
High Court · 11 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 218 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Lim Huat Sing Julian Sebastian practice?
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
Chan Seng Onn SJ dismissed Mr Chan's claim and allowed Mdm Sin's counterclaim for $578,000.
High Court · 5 January 2026 · [2026] SGHC 1
Counsel for the respondent (2)
-
The court awarded the plaintiff costs of $35,000 all-in for the proceedings below and the appeal, made up of $10,000 per day for the two-day trial and $15,000 for the appeal.
High Court · 10 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 286 -
Goh Yihan JC allowed the appeal on the basis that no cause of action had been pleaded to support the counterclaim for $72,200.
High Court · 11 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 218