Meher Malhotra
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Meher Malhotra. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Meher Malhotra appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2024–2025), before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, including Statutory Interpretation, Contempt of Court and Criminal Procedure and Sentencing, and Meher Malhotra acted for the respondent in 1 and the appellant in 1.
- Reported cases
- 3
- Courts
- High Court
- Period
- October 2024 to August 2025
Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Meher Malhotra — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Meher Malhotra appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the appellant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the claimant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal dismissed
- 1
- Appeal allowed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 2 of the 3 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“…the appeal is dismissed.”
High Court · 29 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 173 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal dismissed -
“I allow the appeal and substitute the term of five days’ imprisonment in connection with the careless driving charge with a fine of $11,000 in default 44 days’ imprisonment.”
High Court · 22 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 294 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal allowed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Meher Malhotra practice?
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
Hoo Sheau Peng J dismissed the appeal.
High Court · 29 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 173
Counsel for the appellant (1)
-
The High Court allowed the appeal and substituted the five days' imprisonment on the careless driving charge with a fine of $11,000 in default 44 days' imprisonment.
High Court · 22 November 2024 · [2024] SGHC 294
Counsel for the claimant (1)
-
The court allowed the committal application and found the first defendant in contempt of ORC 4975 under both injunctions.
High Court · 9 October 2024 · [2024] SGHC 254