P

Pradeep Nair

Wong & Leow LLC · 2023–2025 Called to the Bar in 2014 3 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Pradeep Nair. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Pradeep Nair appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the SGHC(A).

These cases span several subject areas, most often Contract, Tort and Equity, and Pradeep Nair acted for the respondent in 1 and the plaintiff in 1.

Reported cases
3
Courts
SGHC(A), SGHC, SGCA
Period
January 2023 to September 2025

Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Pradeep Nair — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Pradeep Nair appeared

Counsel for the respondent
1 case
Counsel for the plaintiff
1 case
Counsel for the appellant
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal allowed in part
1
Appeal dismissed
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 3 cases.

What the courts decided

[2025] SGHC(A) 17 Appeal allowed in part

“For the reasons above, we allow the appeal only in respect of the Judge’s finding that the three heads of loss were caused by the various breaches of contract.”

CENTRICORE (S) PTE. LTD. & 7 Ors v ATT SYSTEMS (S’PORE) PTE LTD & Anor · SGHC(A) · · Counsel for the respondent
[2023] SGCA 1 Appeal dismissed

“…we dismiss the appeal and maintain the anti-suit injunction in the terms ordered by the Judge.”

ANUPAM MITTAL v WESTBRIDGE VENTURES II INVESTMENT HOLDINGS · SGCA · · Counsel for the appellant

Parties in these cases

ATT Infosoft Pte Ltd2 ATT Systems (S'pore) Pte Ltd2 IdGates Pte Ltd2 Aung Thiha Aung2 Kyaw Khaing2 Danesh s/o Sudinthan Pillai2 Kyaw Htun Win2 Toh Shenglong Louis2

What areas of law does Pradeep Nair practice?

3
Appearances
2014
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the respondent (1)

Counsel for the plaintiff (1)

Counsel for the appellant (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →