Qabir Singh Sandhu
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Qabir Singh Sandhu. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Qabir Singh Sandhu appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Tort and Contract, and Qabir Singh Sandhu acted for the defendant in 2 and the appellant in 2.
- Reported cases
- 6
- Courts
- High Court, High Court (Appellate Division)
- Period
- January 2023 to December 2025
Source: derived from 6 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Qabir Singh Sandhu — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Qabir Singh Sandhu appeared
- Counsel for the defendant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the appellant
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the claimant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal allowed in part
- 3
- Appeal allowed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 4 of the 6 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“We therefore allow the appeal in respect of Sandra’s claim for fraudulent misrepresentation against Ken and Sally based on the Safe and Profitable Representation and the Share Investment Representation and order Ken and Sally to be jointly and severally liable to Sandra in the aggregate sum of HK$36,587,400. We uphold the Judge’s conclusions on the remainder of her claims.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 7 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 23 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal allowed in part -
“…the appeal is allowed and I make the following orders:(a) that all proceedings in OC 385 be stayed;(b) the Claimants are to pay the Defendants the costs of the application in SUM 2259 fixed at S$9,000 (all-in); and(c) the Claimants are to pay the Defendants the costs of the appeal in RA 193 fixed at S$12,000 (all-in).”
High Court · 12 December 2023 · [2023] SGHC 352 · Counsel for the claimant · Appeal allowed -
“…we allow the appeals in part and vary the decision below in that we grant a declaration that Johnny is the beneficial owner of 45% of the shares and not 49%.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 10 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 32 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed in part -
“…we allow the appeal in part.”
High Court (Appellate Division) · 26 January 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 3 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal allowed in part
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Qabir Singh Sandhu practice?
Counsel for the defendant (2)
-
Kristy Tan J dismissed the claimants' negligence claim and dismissed Ms Loh's third party claim against the bank.
High Court · 22 December 2025 · [2025] SGHC 258 -
The High Court dismissed the son's claim, finding that he had not proved the alleged oral agreement on a balance of probabilities.
High Court · 23 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 67
Counsel for the appellant (2)
-
By a majority (Steven Chong JCA and Debbie Ong Siew Ling JAD, Woo Bih Li JAD dissenting), the court allowed the appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 7 August 2024 · [2024] SGHC(A) 23 -
The Appellate Division allowed the appeal in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 26 January 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 3
Counsel for the claimant (1)
-
The court allowed the appeal and ordered all proceedings in Originating Claim No 385 of 2023 to be stayed.
High Court · 12 December 2023 · [2023] SGHC 352
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The Appellate Division allowed the appeals in part.
High Court (Appellate Division) · 10 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 32