R

Rai Vijay Kumar

Arbiters Inc Law Corporation · 2023–2025 Called to the Bar in 1990 4 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Rai Vijay Kumar. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Rai Vijay Kumar appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the High Court (Appellate Division).

These cases span several subject areas, most often Legal Profession, and Rai Vijay Kumar acted for the applicant in 2 and the appellant in 2.

Reported cases
4
Courts
High Court (Appellate Division), High Court
Period
July 2023 to September 2025

Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Rai Vijay Kumar — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Rai Vijay Kumar appeared

Counsel for the applicant
2 cases
Counsel for the appellant
2 cases

Recorded outcomes

Application dismissed
2
Appeal dismissed
1

Outcome recorded for 3 of the 4 cases.

What the courts decided

  • “For the foregoing reasons, we summarily dismissed OA 3 without hearing oral arguments, on the basis that the Appellate Division did not have jurisdiction to hear and determine OA 3, pursuant to s 38(1)(a) of the SCJA.”

    High Court (Appellate Division) · 2 September 2025 · [2025] SGHC(A) 14 · Counsel for the applicant · Application dismissed
  • “I dismiss the application and award costs to the Law Society.”

    High Court · 12 August 2025 · [2025] SGHC 159 · Counsel for the applicant · Application dismissed
  • “We dismiss the appeal in its entirety (see [105] and [114] above).”

    High Court (Appellate Division) · 26 July 2023 · [2023] SGHC(A) 26 · Counsel for the appellant · Appeal dismissed

Parties in these cases

What areas of law does Rai Vijay Kumar practice?

4
Appearances
1990
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the applicant (2)

Counsel for the appellant (2)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →