S

Simren Kaur Sandhu

PRP Law LLC · 2023–2026 Called to the Bar in 2013 6 appearances

This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Simren Kaur Sandhu. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.

Simren Kaur Sandhu appears as counsel of record in 6 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.

These cases span several subject areas, most often Companies, Tort and Civil Procedure, and Simren Kaur Sandhu acted for the respondent in 2 and the defendant in 1.

Reported cases
6
Courts
SGHC, SGHC(A), SGHCR
Period
March 2023 to October 2026

Source: derived from 6 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Simren Kaur Sandhu — Reported Cases & Litigation Record

How Simren Kaur Sandhu appeared

Counsel for the respondent
2 cases
Counsel for the defendant
1 case
Counsel for the plaintiff
1 case
Counsel for the third party
1 case
Counsel for the second defendant in S 275
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal allowed
1

Disposition recorded in 1 of 6 cases.

What the courts decided

[2023] SGHC(A) 18 Appeal allowed

“…we allow the appeal and set aside the Judge’s decision in its entirety.”

ALLIANZ CAPITAL PARTNERS GMBH, SINGAPORE BRANCH v ANDRESS GOH · SGHC(A) · · Counsel for the respondent

Parties in these cases

Amit Shah2 Nirav Narola2 Rahul Dholakia2 Govind Dholakia2 The Jewelry Company2 Shree Ramkrishna Exports Pvt Ltd2 J. G. Jewelry Pte Ltd2 Johnson & Johnson International (Singapore) Pte Ltd1

What areas of law does Simren Kaur Sandhu practice?

Companies 2 cases

Reported between March 2023 and March 2025.

Tort 2 cases

Reported between March 2023 and December 2025.

6
Appearances
2013
Year of Call
1
Firm
No
Senior Counsel

Counsel for the defendant (1)

Counsel for the plaintiff (1)

Counsel for the third party (1)

Counsel for the respondent (2)

Counsel for the second defendant in S 275 (1)

Rankings

Most active lawyers by reported court cases →