Tan Chau Yee
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Tan Chau Yee. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Tan Chau Yee appears as counsel of record in 4 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2025), most often before the High Court Registrar.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, and Tan Chau Yee acted for the plaintiff in 2 and the respondent in 1.
- Reported cases
- 4
- Courts
- High Court Registrar, High Court
- Period
- October 2023 to June 2025
Source: derived from 4 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Tan Chau Yee — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Tan Chau Yee appeared
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Claim dismissed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 4 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I therefore dismiss the claim with costs to Joyce.”
High Court · 11 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 288 · Counsel for the plaintiff · Claim dismissed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Tan Chau Yee practice?
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
The Assistant Registrar ordered costs for the Singapore lawyers' work at S$250,000 plus GST of S$21,096.40, S$4,000 plus S$4,645.18 and English fees of £8,400 and £3,000 for the assessment,…
High Court Registrar · 20 June 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 18
Counsel for the plaintiff (2)
-
Assistant Registrar Leo Zhi Wei struck out the claim in part.
High Court Registrar · 2 May 2025 · [2025] SGHCR 12 -
The High Court dismissed the claim with costs to Joyce, finding that the parties intended an equal and unconditional split of the joint account assets and that the Trust Portion belonged to Joyce;…
High Court · 11 October 2023 · [2023] SGHC 288
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The court dismissed Chiang's claim, finding the 2015 and 2019 Agreements were shams, and dismissed both of Ang's counterclaims for beneficial entitlement to 24% of the shares and for conspiracy.
High Court · 30 December 2024 · [2024] SGHC 330