Tan Jia Jun, James
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Tan Jia Jun, James. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Tan Jia Jun, James appears as counsel of record in 8 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure and Companies, and Tan Jia Jun, James acted for the plaintiff in 2 and the third party in 1.
- Reported cases
- 8
- Courts
- High Court
- Period
- March 2023 to September 2026
Source: derived from 8 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Tan Jia Jun, James — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Tan Jia Jun, James appeared
- Counsel for the plaintiff
- 2 cases
- Counsel for the third party
- 1 case
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the defendant
- 1 case
- Counsel for the Golden Landscape & Construction Pte Ltd
- 1 case
- Counsel for the creditor
- 1 case
- Counsel for the applicant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Application dismissed
- 1
- Appeal allowed
- 1
- Appeal allowed in part
- 1
Outcome recorded for 3 of the 8 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“Therefore, HC/SUM 653/2026 is dismissed.”
High Court · 30 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 158 · Counsel for the third party · Application dismissed -
“I allow the appeal against the Decision, and restore the finding in the ID that the respondents had infringed s 34 of the Competition Act.”
High Court · 30 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 139 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed -
“For all the reasons above, I dismissed the appeals in RA/144/2025 and RA/146/2025 and affirmed the AR’s decision to grant a permanent stay of OC 926 on the basis that Singapore is forum non conveniens for the trial of OC 926.”
High Court · 11 February 2026 · [2026] SGHC 34 · Counsel for the defendant · Appeal allowed in part
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Tan Jia Jun, James practice?
Civil Procedure 3 cases
Reported between February 2026 and September 2026.
Companies 2 cases
Reported between August 2023 and March 2024.
Counsel for the plaintiff (2)
-
The High Court fixed costs in all three matters and ordered the defendant to pay the claimants $88,703.57, being the net total.
High Court · 23 September 2026 · [2026] SGHC 194 -
The court allowed the claim in part, assessing damages at US$10,126,158.43 rather than the present-day value the claimants sought, and ordered the defendant to pay that sum with interest at a rate to…
High Court · 9 February 2026 · [2026] SGHC 31
Counsel for the third party (1)
-
The High Court dismissed HC/SUM 653/2026, finding no breach of the duty of full and frank disclosure, so the injunctions remained.
High Court · 30 July 2026 · [2026] SGHC 158
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
Philip Jeyaretnam J allowed the appeal against the CAB's decision, set it aside and restored the CCS's finding that CNL and Gilmon had infringed s 34 of the Competition Act.
High Court · 30 June 2026 · [2026] SGHC 139
Counsel for the defendant (1)
-
The court allowed the appeals in part.
High Court · 11 February 2026 · [2026] SGHC 34
Counsel for the Golden Landscape & Construction Pte Ltd (1)
-
The court allowed the application, placed the company under judicial management and appointed Ms Tan as its judicial manager, with the consequential orders sought.
High Court · 4 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC 58
Counsel for the creditor (1)
-
The High Court allowed the application in part.
High Court · 18 August 2023 · [2023] SGHC 231
Counsel for the applicant (1)
-
Lee Seiu Kin J granted the application.
High Court · 8 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 55