Yeo Kee Teng Mark
This page is a record of reported Singapore judgments that name Yeo Kee Teng Mark. It is not a directory listing. Names and firms appear as they were recorded in each judgment at the time. For current practising status and firm, see the Legal Services Regulatory Authority directory.
Yeo Kee Teng Mark appears as counsel of record in 3 reported Singapore judgments (2023–2026), before the High Court.
These cases span several subject areas, including Tort, Insolvency Law and Companies, and Yeo Kee Teng Mark acted for the respondent in 1 and the non-party in 1.
- Reported cases
- 3
- Courts
- High Court
- Period
- March 2023 to March 2026
Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .
Yeo Kee Teng Mark — Reported Cases & Litigation Record
How Yeo Kee Teng Mark appeared
- Counsel for the respondent
- 1 case
- Counsel for the non-party
- 1 case
- Counsel for the applicant
- 1 case
Recorded outcomes
- Appeal allowed
- 1
Outcome recorded for 1 of the 3 cases.
What the courts decided
-
“I allow the appeal with costs to be paid by the respondent.”
High Court · 25 March 2026 · [2026] SGHC 63 · Counsel for the respondent · Appeal allowed
Parties in these cases
What areas of law does Yeo Kee Teng Mark practice?
Counsel for the respondent (1)
-
Chua Lee Ming J allowed the appeal with costs to be paid by the respondent.
High Court · 25 March 2026 · [2026] SGHC 63
Counsel for the non-party (1)
-
The High Court allowed the application and ordered the company to be wound up, appointing joint and several liquidators.
High Court · 27 March 2024 · [2024] SGHC 87
Counsel for the applicant (1)
-
Sundaresh Menon CJ, in an ex tempore judgment, allowed both applications, made an order in terms of each application for admission, and held that no further deferment was necessary.
High Court · 9 March 2023 · [2023] SGHC 59