S

Sandeep Jethanand Bhojwani

Person 3 cases

Sandeep Jethanand Bhojwani appears in 3 reported Singapore court cases (2023–2026), most often before the SGHC.

These cases span several subject areas, most often Civil Procedure, Trusts and Equity, and Sandeep Jethanand Bhojwani was the plaintiff in 2 and the respondent in 1.

Reported cases
3
Courts
SGHC, SGHC(A)
Period
May 2023 to January 2026

Source: derived from 3 published Singapore judgments, most recent decision .

Sandeep Jethanand Bhojwani in the reported-judgment record

How Sandeep Jethanand Bhojwani appeared

Plaintiff
2 cases
Respondent
1 case

Recorded outcomes

Appeal allowed in part
1
Application allowed
1

Disposition recorded in 2 of 3 cases.

What the courts decided

[2026] SGHC(A) 5 Appeal allowed in part

“For the reasons given below, save for certain adjustments to the remedies awarded to the Brothers, we dismiss Sajan’s appeal in AD 3 and allow the Brothers’ appeal in AD 4.”

JETHANAND HARKISHINDAS BHOJWANI v DEVIN JETHANAND BHOJWANI & 2 Ors · SGHC(A) · · Respondent
[2023] SGHC 128 Application allowed

“For the reasons that I have stated above, I allowed both the Live Companies’ and the defendant’s applications for a stay of the discovery orders.”

DEVIN JETHANAND BHOJWANI & 2 Ors v JETHANAND HARKISHINDAS BHOJWANI · SGHC · · Plaintiff

Parties in these cases

Dilip Jethanand Bhojwani3 Devin Jethanand Bhojwani3 Jethanand Harkishindas Bhojwani3 Liberty Merchandising Company (Private) Limited1 Malaya Silk Store Pte Ltd1 Shankar’s Emporium (Private) Limited1

Reported cases

JETHANAND HARKISHINDAS BHOJWANI v DEVIN JETHANAND BHOJWANI & 2 Ors
[2026] SGHC(A) 5 SGHC(A) Respondent 30 January 2026
Outcome Appeal allowed in part

“For the reasons given below, save for certain adjustments to the remedies awarded to the Brothers, we dismiss Sajan’s appeal in AD 3 and allow the Brothers’ appeal in AD 4.”

Source: [2026] SGHC(A) 5, SGHC(A). Read directly from the judgment.

DEVIN JETHANAND BHOJWANI & 2 Ors v JETHANAND HARKISHINDAS BHOJWANI
[2023] SGHC 128 SGHC Plaintiff 5 May 2023
Outcome Application allowed

“For the reasons that I have stated above, I allowed both the Live Companies’ and the defendant’s applications for a stay of the discovery orders.”

Source: [2023] SGHC 128, SGHC. Read directly from the judgment.

See the full cases for the judgment text, legal issues, and counsel involved.

Practice Areas

Relationships