Copyright Act Cap 63

5 judgments · 2 courts · 9 cited sections

The Copyright Act (Cap 63) has been cited, interpreted or applied in 5 Singapore judgments in this corpus, spanning 9 distinct sections. The decisions below are the primary source for how the courts have read it. This page reports those decisions; it is not legal advice.

Which sections of the Copyright Act have the courts cited?

Sections of Cap 63 referenced across the 5 judgments below.

s 103 s 109 s 115(4) s 119(4) s 124 s 146(1) s 146(1)(b) s 159(3) s 499

Which cases interpret the Copyright Act?

[2026] SGHC 77
THE BEAUTY NATION PTE. LTD. v HERBS HEALTH BEN CAO KANG MU PTE. LTD. & Anor
10 April 2026
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 266
FirstCom Academy Pte Ltd v Oom Academy Pte Ltd & 3 Ors
30 December 2025
SGHC
[2025] SGHC 122
LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER v Ng Hoe Seng (formerly trading as EMCASE SG)
2 July 2025
SGHC
[2024] SGCA 39
SYED SUHAIL BIN SYED ZIN & 12 Ors v ATTORNEY GENERAL
11 October 2024
SGCA
[2024] SGHC 39
TIGER PICTURES ENTERTAINMENT LTD v ENCORE FILMS PTE LTD
9 February 2024
SGHC

Read the statute

The authoritative, consolidated text of the Copyright Act is published by the Singapore government on Singapore Statutes Online. We link to the primary source rather than reproduce it.

Copyright Act (Cap 63) on Singapore Statutes Online ↗

Compiled by the SG Case Law editorial team from primary sources — the judgments themselves and Singapore Statutes Online (sso.agc.gov.sg). · Updated 24 June 2026 · How we compile this